Economists Debate True Scale of Inequality Due to Data Gaps on Unreported Income and Tax Evasion
-
There is a debate among economists over whether income inequality has truly risen sharply since the 1960s or stayed flat. The answer hangs on technical details about unreported income and tax evasion.
-
The two sides make different assumptions about who evades more taxes - the rich or the middle class and poor. But the data to resolve this is quite limited.
-
How economists define "income" also drives the different conclusions. This includes government spending on public goods and health care, which many wouldn't consider real personal income.
-
Outside the debate, other data do show rising inequality, like the huge growth in billionaire wealth and diverging life expectancies between rich and poor.
-
In the end, economics relies on assumptions about human behavior and what constitutes income. So reasonable people can disagree given the data limitations.