A.I. Art's Limits Should Spur Us To Value Human Creativity
-
A.I. art lacks innovation, only approximating and reconstituting existing materials. It poses no direct threat to human creativity.
-
The real threat is humans acting more machine-like, with culture shaped by algorithms and standardized datasets rather than profundity.
-
If A.I. art matches the quality of human art, it likely means human art has become artificial and shallow already.
-
We should demand more from human art, using technology as a tool for human flourishing rather than replacement.
-
A.I. art's mediocrity should press us to revalue the unique capabilities of human creation and imagination.