Amazon’s First ‘Fallout’ Show Art Is AI Generated

Artificial intelligence (AI) is seen as a tool that can inspire and collaborate with human creatives in the movie and TV industry, but concerns remain about copyright and ethical issues, according to Greg Harrison, chief creative officer at MOCEAN. Although AI has potential for visual brainstorming and automation of non-creative tasks, it should be used cautiously and in a way that values human creativity and culture.

Amazon Prime Video's first teaser poster for the upcoming live-action series Fallout has received backlash from fans who believe it was created using AI art and contains numerous mistakes and anomalies.

Pokémon Go publisher Niantic is suspected of using AI-generated artwork in their promotional material for the upcoming season, sparking disappointment among fans who prefer the work of real artists.

Amazon.com is now requiring writers to disclose if their books include artificial intelligence material, a step praised by the Authors Guild as a means to ensure transparency and accountability for AI-generated content.

The iconic entertainment site, The A.V. Club, received backlash for publishing AI-generated articles that were found to be copied verbatim from IMDb, raising concerns about the use of AI in journalism and its potential impact on human jobs.

The rise of easily accessible artificial intelligence is leading to an influx of AI-generated goods, including self-help books, wall art, and coloring books, which can be difficult to distinguish from authentic, human-created products, leading to scam products and potential harm to real artists.

AI robots were present at an NFL game to promote the upcoming movie "The Creator," causing a scare among the crowd.

AI has produced computer-generated renderings of Iron Maiden album art and their iconic mascot Eddie, creating twisted and terrifying masterpieces that question the nature of technology and its place in our world.

Getty Images is reaffirming its stance against AI-generated content by banning submissions created with Adobe's Firefly-powered generative AI tools, a move that contrasts with competitor Shutterstock's allowance of AI-generated content.

The US Copyright Office has ruled for the third time that AI-generated art cannot be copyrighted, raising questions about whether AI-generated art is categorically excluded from copyright protection or if human creators should be listed as the image's creator. The office's position, which is based on existing copyright doctrine, has been criticized for being unscalable and a potential quagmire, as it fails to consider the creative choices made by AI systems similar to those made by human photographers.