### Summary
The article discusses the rapid advancement and potential risks of artificial intelligence (AI) and proposes the idea of nationalizing certain aspects of AI under a governing body called the Humane AI Commission to ensure AI is aligned with human interests.
### Facts
- AI is evolving rapidly and penetrating various aspects of American life, from image recognition to healthcare.
- AI has the potential to bring both significant benefits and risks to society.
- Transparency in AI is limited, and understanding how specific AI works is difficult.
- Congress is becoming more aware of the importance of AI and its need for regulation.
- The author proposes the creation of a governing body, the Humane AI Commission, that can control and steer AI technology to serve humanity's best interests.
- The nationalization of advanced AI models could be considered, similar to the Atomic Energy Commission's control over nuclear reactors.
- Various options, such as an AI pause or leaving AI development to the free market or current government agencies, have limitations in addressing the potential risks of AI.
- The author suggests that the United States should take a bold executive leadership approach to develop a national AI plan and ensure global AI leadership with a focus on benevolence and human-controlled AI.
### 🤖 AI Nationalization - The case to nationalize the “nuclear reactors” of AI — the world’s most advanced AI models — hinges on this question: Who do we want to control AI’s nuclear codes? Big Tech CEOs answering to a few billionaire shareholders, or the government of the United States, answering to its citizens?
### 👥 Humane AI Commission - The author proposes the creation of a Humane AI Commission, run by AI experts, to steer and control AI technology in alignment with human interests.
### ⚠️ Risks of AI - AI's rapid advancement and lack of transparency pose risks such as unpredictable behavior, potential damage to power generation, financial markets, and public health, and the potential for AI to move beyond human control.
### ⚖️ AI Regulation - The article calls for federal regulation of AI, but emphasizes the limitations of traditional regulation in addressing the fast-evolving nature of AI and the need for a larger-scale approach like nationalization.
### Summary
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a transformative technology that will reshape politics, economies, and societies, but it also poses significant challenges and risks. To effectively govern AI, policymakers should adopt a new governance framework that is precautionary, agile, inclusive, impermeable, and targeted. This framework should be built upon common principles and encompass three overlapping governance regimes: one for establishing facts and advising governments, one for preventing AI arms races, and one for managing disruptive forces. Additionally, global AI governance must move past traditional conceptions of sovereignty and invite technology companies to participate in rule-making processes.
### Facts
- **AI Progression**: AI systems have been evolving rapidly and possess the potential to self-improve and achieve quasi-autonomy. Models with trillions of parameters and brain-scale models could be viable within a few years.
- **Dual Use**: AI is dual-use, meaning it has both military and civilian applications. The boundaries between the two are blurred, and AI can be used to create and spread misinformation, conduct surveillance, and produce powerful weapons.
- **Accessible and Proliferation Risks**: AI has become increasingly accessible and proliferated, making regulatory efforts challenging. The ease of copying AI algorithms and models poses proliferation risks, as well as the potential for misuse and unintended consequences.
- **Shift in Global Power**: AI's advancement and geopolitical competition in AI supremacy are shifting the structure and balance of global power. Technology companies are becoming powerful actors in the digital realm, challenging the authority of nation-states.
- **Inadequate Governance**: Current regulatory efforts are insufficient to govern AI effectively. There is a need for a new governance framework that is agile, inclusive, and targeted to address the unique challenges posed by AI.
- **Principles for AI Governance**: Precaution, agility, inclusivity, impermeability, and targeting are key principles for AI governance. These principles should guide the development of granular regulatory frameworks.
- **Three Overlapping Governance Regimes**: Policy frameworks should include a regime for fact-finding, advising governments on AI risks; a regime for preventing AI arms races through international cooperation and monitoring; and a regime for managing disruptive forces and crises related to AI.
### Emoji
:robot:
Microsoft's report on governing AI in India provides five policy suggestions while emphasizing the importance of ethical AI, human control over AI systems, and the need for multilateral frameworks to ensure responsible AI development and deployment worldwide.
The UK Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, aims to position the country as a leading player in the global artificial intelligence (AI) industry, including hosting a summit on AI safety and providing financial support to UK AI companies; there has been significant growth in the number of British enterprises pursuing AI technologies over the past decade.
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) is seen as a positive development in terms of addressing environmental challenges, but there are concerns about AI's own carbon footprint due to energy-intensive processes such as data training and computer hardware production.
The UK will host a global summit on the safe use of artificial intelligence (AI) on 1 and 2 November, aiming to establish an international consensus on the future development of AI and address the risks associated with the technology. World leaders, AI companies, and experts will meet at Bletchley Park, where Alan Turing worked, to discuss the responsible development of AI. The guest list has yet to be confirmed, with uncertainty over whether China will be represented. The UK government hopes this summit will solidify its position as a major player in the AI sector.
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools can put human rights at risk, as highlighted by researchers from Amnesty International on the Me, Myself, and AI podcast, who discuss scenarios in which AI is used to track activists and make automated decisions that can lead to discrimination and inequality, emphasizing the need for human intervention and changes in public policy to address these issues.
Nigeria is inviting scientists of Nigerian heritage and globally renowned AI experts to collaborate in formulating its National AI Strategy, recognizing the potential of AI in shaping innovative tech solutions for national challenges.
The UK government has been urged to introduce new legislation to regulate artificial intelligence (AI) in order to keep up with the European Union (EU) and the United States, as the EU advances with the AI Act and US policymakers publish frameworks for AI regulations. The government's current regulatory approach risks lagging behind the fast pace of AI development, according to a report by the science, innovation, and technology committee. The report highlights 12 governance challenges, including bias in AI systems and the production of deepfake material, that need to be addressed in order to guide the upcoming global AI safety summit at Bletchley Park.
The U.K. has outlined its priorities for the upcoming global AI summit, with a focus on risk and policy to regulate the technology and ensure its safe development for the public good.
Lawmakers in the Senate Energy Committee were warned about the threats and opportunities associated with the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into the U.S. energy sector, with a particular emphasis on the risk posed by China's AI advancements and the need for education and regulation to mitigate negative impacts.
The G20 member nations have pledged to use artificial intelligence (AI) in a responsible manner, addressing concerns such as data protection, biases, human oversight, and ethics, while also planning for the future of cryptocurrencies and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).
AI has the potential to fundamentally change governments and society, with AI-powered companies and individuals usurping traditional institutions and creating a new world order, warns economist Samuel Hammond. Traditional governments may struggle to regulate AI and keep pace with its advancements, potentially leading to a loss of global power for these governments.
Spain has established Europe's first artificial intelligence (AI) policy task force, the Spanish Agency for the Supervision of Artificial Intelligence (AESIA), to determine laws and provide a framework for the development and implementation of AI technology in the country. Many governments are uncertain about how to regulate AI, balancing its potential benefits with fears of abuse and misuse.
Eight new technology companies, including Adobe, IBM, Nvidia, Palantir, and Salesforce, have made voluntary commitments on artificial intelligence (AI) to drive safe and secure development while working towards comprehensive regulation, according to a senior Biden administration official. The commitments include outside testing of AI systems, cybersecurity measures, information sharing, research on societal risks, and addressing society's challenges. The White House is partnering with the private sector to harness the benefits of AI while managing the risks.
World leaders gathering for the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Summit are facing the failure of their grand promises, with the goals unlikely to be achieved until half a century late, and the author argues that prioritization is needed to focus on the most efficient policies that can deliver significant social benefits at a low cost.
The United Nations is urging the international community to confront the potential risks and benefits of Artificial Intelligence, which has the power to transform the world.
President Biden has called for the governance of artificial intelligence to ensure it is used as a tool of opportunity and not as a weapon of oppression, emphasizing the need for international collaboration and regulation in this area.
Governments worldwide are grappling with the challenge of regulating artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, as countries like Australia, Britain, China, the European Union, France, G7 nations, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Spain, the United Nations, and the United States take steps to establish regulations and guidelines for AI usage.
Deputy Prime Minister Oliver Dowden will warn the UN that artificial intelligence (AI) poses a threat to world order unless governments take action, with fears that the rapid pace of AI development could lead to job losses, misinformation, and discrimination without proper regulations in place. Dowden will call for global regulation and emphasize the importance of making rules in parallel with AI development rather than retroactively. Despite the need for regulation, experts note the complexity of reaching a quick international agreement, with meaningful input needed from smaller countries, marginalized communities, and ethnic minorities. The UK aims to take the lead in AI regulation, but there are concerns that without swift action, the European Union's AI Act could become the global standard instead.
There is a need for more policy balance in discussions about artificial intelligence (AI) to focus on the potential for good and how to ensure societal benefit, as AI has the potential to advance education, national security, and economic success, while also providing new economic opportunities and augmenting human capabilities.
The United Nations aims to bring inclusiveness, legitimacy, and authority to the regulation of artificial intelligence, leveraging its experience with managing the impact of various technologies and creating compliance pressure for commitments made by governments, according to Amandeep Gill, the organization's top tech-policy official. Despite the challenges of building consensus and engaging stakeholders, the U.N. seeks to promote diverse and inclusive innovation to ensure equal opportunities and prevent concentration of economic power. Gill also emphasizes the potential of AI in accelerating progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals but expresses concerns about potential misuse and concentration of power.
The Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University is hosting a series of discussions on the application of artificial intelligence in the energy sector, aiming to accelerate the discovery of new technologies and optimize operations.
Artificial intelligence (AI) will have a significant impact on geopolitics and globalization, driving a new globalization but also posing risks that the world is not yet ready for, according to political scientist Ian Bremmer. Global leaders and policymakers are now catching up and discussing the implications of AI, but a greater understanding of the technology is needed for effective regulation. Bremmer suggests international cooperation, such as a United Nations-driven process, to establish global oversight and prevent the U.S. versus China competition in AI development.
AI has the potential to augment human work and create shared prosperity, but without proper implementation and worker power, it can lead to job replacement, economic inequality, and concentrated political power.
UNESCO and the Dutch government are collaborating on a project to develop a framework for the ethical oversight of AI in the European Union, aimed at shaping the technological development in line with societal values and creating best practice recommendations.
AI analysis of speeches made at the 78th session of the UN General Assembly reveals that climate, development, and peace are the top three concerns for world leaders.
Machine learning has the potential to aid climate action by providing insights and optimizing sustainability efforts, but researchers must address challenges related to data, computing resources, and the environmental impact of AI.
China's use of artificial intelligence (AI) for surveillance and oppression should deter the United States from collaborating with China on AI development and instead focus on asserting itself in international standards-setting bodies, open sourcing AI technologies, and promoting explainable AI to ensure transparency and uphold democratic values.
Advisers to UK Chancellor Rishi Sunak are working on a statement to be used in a communique at the AI safety summit next month, although they are unlikely to reach an agreement on establishing a new international organisation to oversee AI. The summit will focus on the risks of AI models, debate national security agencies' scrutiny of dangerous versions of the technology, and discuss international cooperation on AI that poses a threat to human life.
Leaders of the G7 are expected to establish international AI regulations by the end of the year, as part of the Hiroshima AI Process, in order to ensure safe and trustworthy generative AI systems and drive further economic growth and improvement of living conditions, said Japanese prime minister Fumia Kishida at the UN-sponsored Internet Governance Forum.
Artificial intelligence (AI) will surpass human intelligence and could manipulate people, according to AI pioneer Geoffrey Hinton, who quit his role at Google to raise awareness about the risks of AI and advocate for regulations. Hinton also expressed concerns about AI's impact on the labor market and its potential militaristic uses, and called for governments to commit to not building battlefield robots. Global efforts are underway to regulate AI, with the U.K. hosting a global AI summit and the U.S. crafting an AI Bill of Rights.
Democratic lawmakers have urged President Biden to turn non-binding safeguards on artificial intelligence (AI) into policy through an executive order, using the AI Bill of Rights as a guide to set in place comprehensive AI policy across the federal government.
A coalition of Democrats is urging President Biden to turn non-binding safeguards on artificial intelligence (AI) into policy through an executive order, using the "AI Bill of Rights" as a guide.
Artificial intelligence (AI) could consume as much energy as Sweden and undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions, warns a study published in the journal Joule, highlighting the need for more sustainable AI practices.
AI technology has advanced rapidly, bringing both positive and negative consequences such as improved accuracy and potential risks to the economy, national security, and various industries, requiring government regulation and ethical considerations to prevent misuse and protect human values.
Governments can steer the evolution of AI towards more equitable outcomes by investing in AI infrastructure and promoting responsible AI education, thereby ensuring the distribution of technological benefits and driving societal progress.
Singapore and the US have collaborated to harmonize their artificial intelligence (AI) frameworks in order to promote safe and responsible AI innovation while reducing compliance costs. They have published a crosswalk to align Singapore's AI Verify with the US NIST's AI RMF and are planning to establish a bilateral AI governance group to exchange information and advance shared principles. The collaboration also includes research on AI safety and security and workforce development initiatives.
