- Capitol Hill is not known for being tech-savvy, but during a recent Senate hearing on AI regulation, legislators showed surprising knowledge and understanding of the topic.
- Senator Richard Blumenthal asked about setting safety breaks on AutoGPT, an AI agent that can carry out complex tasks, to ensure its responsible use.
- Senator Josh Hawley raised concerns about the working conditions of Kenyan workers involved in building safety filters for OpenAI's models.
- The hearing featured testimonies from Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, Stuart Russell, a computer science professor, and Yoshua Bengio, a professor at UniversitĂŠ de MontrĂŠal.
- This indicates a growing awareness and interest among lawmakers in understanding and regulating AI technology.
### Summary
The article discusses the rapid advancement and potential risks of artificial intelligence (AI) and proposes the idea of nationalizing certain aspects of AI under a governing body called the Humane AI Commission to ensure AI is aligned with human interests.
### Facts
- AI is evolving rapidly and penetrating various aspects of American life, from image recognition to healthcare.
- AI has the potential to bring both significant benefits and risks to society.
- Transparency in AI is limited, and understanding how specific AI works is difficult.
- Congress is becoming more aware of the importance of AI and its need for regulation.
- The author proposes the creation of a governing body, the Humane AI Commission, that can control and steer AI technology to serve humanity's best interests.
- The nationalization of advanced AI models could be considered, similar to the Atomic Energy Commission's control over nuclear reactors.
- Various options, such as an AI pause or leaving AI development to the free market or current government agencies, have limitations in addressing the potential risks of AI.
- The author suggests that the United States should take a bold executive leadership approach to develop a national AI plan and ensure global AI leadership with a focus on benevolence and human-controlled AI.
### đ¤ AI Nationalization - The case to nationalize the ânuclear reactorsâ of AI â the worldâs most advanced AI models â hinges on this question: Who do we want to control AIâs nuclear codes? Big Tech CEOs answering to a few billionaire shareholders, or the government of the United States, answering to its citizens?
### đĽ Humane AI Commission - The author proposes the creation of a Humane AI Commission, run by AI experts, to steer and control AI technology in alignment with human interests.
### â ď¸ Risks of AI - AI's rapid advancement and lack of transparency pose risks such as unpredictable behavior, potential damage to power generation, financial markets, and public health, and the potential for AI to move beyond human control.
### âď¸ AI Regulation - The article calls for federal regulation of AI, but emphasizes the limitations of traditional regulation in addressing the fast-evolving nature of AI and the need for a larger-scale approach like nationalization.
The U.S. is falling behind in regulating artificial intelligence (AI), while Europe has passed the world's first comprehensive AI law; President Joe Biden recently met with industry leaders to discuss the need for AI regulation and companies pledged to develop safeguards for AI-generated content and prioritize user privacy.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is hosting an "Insight Forum" on artificial intelligence (AI) with top tech executives, including Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg, to discuss regulation of the AI industry.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer's upcoming AI summit in Washington D.C. will include key figures from Hollywood and Silicon Valley, indicating the growing threat that AI poses to the entertainment industry and the ongoing strikes in Hollywood. The event aims to establish a framework for regulating AI, but forming legislation will take time and involve multiple forums.
The UK government has been urged to introduce new legislation to regulate artificial intelligence (AI) in order to keep up with the European Union (EU) and the United States, as the EU advances with the AI Act and US policymakers publish frameworks for AI regulations. The government's current regulatory approach risks lagging behind the fast pace of AI development, according to a report by the science, innovation, and technology committee. The report highlights 12 governance challenges, including bias in AI systems and the production of deepfake material, that need to be addressed in order to guide the upcoming global AI safety summit at Bletchley Park.
Mustafa Suleyman, CEO of Inflection AI, argues that restricting the sale of AI technologies and appointing a cabinet-level regulator are necessary steps to combat the negative effects of artificial intelligence and prevent misuse.
Lawmakers in the Senate Energy Committee were warned about the threats and opportunities associated with the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into the U.S. energy sector, with a particular emphasis on the risk posed by China's AI advancements and the need for education and regulation to mitigate negative impacts.
Congress is holding its first-ever meeting on artificial intelligence, with prominent tech leaders like Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Bill Gates attending to discuss regulation of the fast-moving technology and its potential risks and benefits.
Eight big tech companies, including Adobe, IBM, Salesforce, and Nvidia, have pledged to conduct more testing and research on the risks of artificial intelligence (AI) in a meeting with White House officials, signaling a "bridge" to future government action on the issue. These voluntary commitments come amidst congressional scrutiny and ongoing efforts by the White House to develop policies for AI.
Senators Richard Blumenthal and Josh Hawley are holding a hearing to discuss legislation on regulating artificial intelligence (AI), with a focus on protecting against potential dangers posed by AI and improving transparency and public trust in AI companies. The bipartisan legislation framework includes creating an independent oversight body, clarifying legal liability for AI harms, and requiring companies to disclose when users are interacting with AI models or systems. The hearing comes ahead of a major AI Insight Forum, where top tech executives will provide insights to all 100 senators.
Tech CEOs Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg will be participating in Sen. Majority Leader Chuck Schumer's first AI Insight Forum, where lawmakers will have the opportunity to hear from them about artificial intelligence.
The CEOs of several influential tech companies, including Google, IBM, Microsoft, and OpenAI, will meet with federal lawmakers as the US Senate prepares to draft legislation regulating the AI industry, reflecting policymakers' growing awareness of the potential disruptions and risks associated with AI technology.
California Senator Scott Wiener is introducing a bill to regulate artificial intelligence (AI) in the state, aiming to establish transparency requirements, legal liability, and security measures for advanced AI systems. The bill also proposes setting up a state research cloud called "CalCompute" to support AI development outside of big industry.
Tech tycoons such as Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Bill Gates meet with senators on Capitol Hill to discuss the regulation of artificial intelligence, with Musk warning that AI poses a "civilizational risk" and others emphasizing the need for immigration and standards reforms.
Technology leaders, including Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Sundar Pichai, met with lawmakers to discuss regulating artificial intelligence and the need for a referee to ensure safety and public interest.
Tech leaders, including Elon Musk, held closed-door meetings with congressional lawmakers on the benefits and risks of artificial intelligence.
US Senator Chuck Schumer's "AI Insight Forum" on potential AI regulation faced criticism for having a heavily corporate guest list of CEOs and lacking technical expertise and diversity, with concerns raised about the understanding of AI and its impact on society.
Recent Capitol Hill activity, including proposed legislation and AI hearings, provides corporate leaders with greater clarity on the federal regulation of artificial intelligence, offering insight into potential licensing requirements, oversight, accountability, transparency, and consumer protections.
The AI industry should learn from the regulatory challenges faced by the crypto industry and take a proactive approach in building relationships with lawmakers, highlighting the benefits of AI technology, and winning public support through campaigns in key congressional districts and states.
Tech leaders gathered in Washington, DC, to discuss AI regulation and endorsed the need for laws governing generative AI technology, although there was little consensus on the specifics of those regulations.
A closed-door meeting between US senators and tech industry leaders on AI regulation has sparked debate over the role of corporate leaders in policymaking.
A bipartisan group of senators is expected to introduce legislation to create a government agency to regulate AI and require AI models to obtain a license before deployment, a move that some leading technology companies have supported; however, critics argue that licensing regimes and a new AI regulator could hinder innovation and concentrate power among existing players, similar to the undesirable economic consequences seen in Europe.
Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff argues that the government needs to step up and regulate artificial intelligence before it becomes too powerful, citing the failures in regulating social media companies.
A new poll reveals that 63% of American voters believe regulation should actively prevent the development of superintelligent AI, challenging the assumption that artificial general intelligence (AGI) should exist. The public is increasingly questioning the potential risks and costs associated with AGI, highlighting the need for democratic input and oversight in the development of transformative technologies.
Tech leaders, including Elon Musk, joined senators to discuss AI regulation, with Musk suggesting that Twitter users may have to pay a monthly fee to combat bots on the platform.
Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales believes that regulating artificial intelligence (AI) is not feasible and compares the idea to "magical thinking," stating that many politicians lack a strong understanding of AI and its potential. While the UN is establishing a panel to investigate global regulation of AI, some experts, including physicist Reinhard Scholl, emphasize the need for regulation to prevent the misuse of AI by bad actors, while others, like Robert Opp, suggest forming a regulatory body similar to the International Civil Aviation Organisation. However, Wales argues that regulating individual developers using freely available AI software is impractical.
The U.S. government must establish regulations and enforce standards to ensure the safety and security of artificial intelligence (AI) development, including requiring developers to demonstrate the safety of their systems before deployment, according to Anthony Aguirre, the executive director and secretary of the board at the Future of Life Institute.
Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong argues that AI should not be regulated and instead advocates for decentralization and open-sourcing as a means to foster innovation and competition in the space.
Artificial intelligence has become a prominent topic at the UN General Assembly as governments and industry leaders discuss the need for regulation to mitigate risks and maximize benefits, with the United Nations set to launch an AI advisory board this fall.
Sen. Mark Warner, a U.S. Senator from Virginia, is urging Congress to take a less ambitious approach to regulating artificial intelligence (AI), suggesting that lawmakers should focus on narrowly focused issues rather than trying to address the full spectrum of AI risks with a single comprehensive law. Warner believes that tackling immediate concerns, such as AI-generated deepfakes, is a more realistic and effective approach to regulation. He also emphasizes the need for bipartisan agreement and action to demonstrate progress in the regulation of AI, especially given Congress's previous failures in addressing issues related to social media.
Elon Musk advocates for the creation of an AI referee to regulate the AI industry and ensure public safety, emphasizing the need to address the dual nature of AI and existing inequalities.
AI leaders including Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai, Microsoft president Brad Smith, and OpenAI's Sam Altman are supporting AI regulation to ensure investment security, unified rules, and a role in shaping legislation, as regulations also benefit consumers by ensuring safety, cracking down on scams and discrimination, and eliminating bias.
CEOs prioritize investments in generative AI, but there are concerns about the allocation of capital, ethical challenges, cybersecurity risks, and the lack of regulation in the AI landscape.
Artificial intelligence (AI) will surpass human intelligence and could manipulate people, according to AI pioneer Geoffrey Hinton, who quit his role at Google to raise awareness about the risks of AI and advocate for regulations. Hinton also expressed concerns about AI's impact on the labor market and its potential militaristic uses, and called for governments to commit to not building battlefield robots. Global efforts are underway to regulate AI, with the U.K. hosting a global AI summit and the U.S. crafting an AI Bill of Rights.
President Biden's executive order on artificial intelligence is expected to use the federal government's purchasing power to influence American AI standards, tighten industry guidelines, require cloud computing companies to monitor users developing powerful AI systems, and boost AI talent recruitment and domestic training.