AI Authors on Trial: Generative Models Face Copyright Lawsuits for Training on Books Without Permission
-
Generative AI models like ChatGPT are being sued for copyright infringement for using books without permission to train themselves. Tech companies claim this is "fair use" while authors argue it reduces incentives to create.
-
Copyright law aims to foster creativity by granting creators control over their works. The question is whether AI's "transformative" creations provide a public benefit that outweighs disincentives.
-
AI-generated content could substitute for buying books or commissioning art, shrinking those markets. Presenting human knowledge without citation also harms research communities.
-
Tech companies argue reading books to train AI should be allowed like a person reading them. But the scale of commercial use may outweigh that.
-
Judges face tough decisions on whether protecting AI or authors better serves the public. Overly limiting copyright could significantly dampen human creativity and culture.