AI Writing Tools Gain Traction in Science But Spark Concerns Over Quality and Ethics, Nature Survey Finds
-
In a 2023 Nature survey, 30% of scientists said they had used generative AI to help write manuscripts and 15% to help write grants. The tools can increase productivity but also strain peer review.
-
55% felt a benefit is improving editing and translations for non-native English speakers. 85% thought AI could do repetitive tasks like literature reviews.
-
Risks include AI generating factual mistakes and fabricated info. It could also incentivize low-quality work by some researchers.
-
As of late 2022, 24 of the top 100 publishers had guidance allowing disclosed AI use. But enforcement is challenging and tools to detect AI text are limited.
-
Some organizations like NIH ban AI use in peer review over confidentiality concerns. But rules are evolving and can’t fully police what researchers do.