GDAL Outperforms Python Tools in Raster-Vector Conversion Test
-
Compared performance of GDAL vs Rasterio + GeoPandas for raster to vector transformation. GDAL was significantly faster (0.8 sec vs 23 sec).
-
GDAL leverages optimized C/C++ code and does direct polygonization. Rasterio + GeoPandas have Python overhead for data manipulation.
-
Rasterio/GeoPandas workflow requires more explicit in-memory data handling steps compared to GDAL's internal optimizations.
-
As a mature geospatial library, GDAL is highly optimized for performance. Rasterio/GeoPandas add a Python interface but with some abstraction overhead.
-
For real applications, GDAL can be much faster. Rasterio performance could be improved by optimizing looping and data access.