SBF Testimony Backfires as Forgetful Founder Falters Under Cross-Examination
-
Sam Bankman-Fried's testimony is damaging himself more than helping his case. He's blaming lawyers but can't recall specifics.
-
Sassoon cross-examined SBF ruthlessly, revealing evasiveness and gaps in memory. His parents looked unhappy watching it.
-
SBF claims disappearing Signal messages were approved by lawyers, but can't prove it. Makes excuses for moving customer funds.
-
SBF hired general counsel Dan Friedberg but now implies Friedberg made key decisions. Friedberg has a history of scandal.
-
If SBF testifies like this in front of the jury, he's cooked. He looks worse trying to evade questions and has huge memory gaps.