Bankman-Fried Struggles on Witness Stand as Prosecutors Use Past Statements Against Him
-
Bankman-Fried's decision to testify was risky but necessary for his "good faith" defense. His evasive responses under cross-examination may undermine his credibility.
-
His pre-trial media tour provided ample fodder for prosecutors to confront him with past statements.
-
He provided an alternative narrative of events but struggled when prosecutors presented exhibits of his past comments.
-
Judge chastised him for evading questions, signaling to the jury he was wrestling with prosecutors.
-
His extensive public comments before arrest made prosecution's job easier and boxed him into a corner.