Main Topic: The possibility of federal charges against former President Donald Trump in relation to the Jan. 6 riot and efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
Key Points:
1. Trump's legal and political teams are preparing for the possibility of a federal grand jury voting on charges against him.
2. Trump has been notified that he is a target in the investigation into the Jan. 6 riot.
3. The specific charges Trump may face, if any, remain unknown.
Main Topic: Investigation into Donald Trump
Key Points:
1. Donald Trump received a letter notifying him that he is the target of a grand jury examining the Jan. 6 riot and efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
2. Trump has already been indicted in Florida for allegedly mishandling national secrets and in New York for a case involving payments to Stormy Daniels.
3. Trump's lawyers have met with prosecutors and expect an indictment. Former Rep. Mo Brooks claims Trump asked him to overturn the 2020 election but has not been contacted by the special counsel.
Main Topic: Indictment and legal proceedings against former President Donald Trump
Key Points:
1. Former Vice President Mike Pence denounces Trump's "crackpot lawyers" and asserts that anyone who puts themselves over the Constitution should never be president.
2. Secret Service is working with Capitol Police and local authorities to ensure Trump's safety during his arraignment.
3. Special counsel Jack Smith asks for a conflict of interest hearing in the classified documents case, while Trump's lawyer John Eastman declines a plea deal and plans to go to trial.
Main Topic: Former President Donald Trump's arraignment on charges related to his attempts to overturn the 2020 election results.
Key Points:
1. Trump faces 78 felony charges across three criminal cases, including obstruction of an official proceeding and conspiracy against the right to vote.
2. Trump's lawyer will represent him during the court appearance.
3. Security at the courthouse is intense, and officers who defended the Capitol on January 6 hope to attend the hearing.
Main Topic: The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump's election obstruction case is expected to set a start date for the trial before the end of the month.
Key Points:
1. Federal prosecutors want the trial to begin within three months, while Trump's lawyer suggests a three-year preparation period.
2. Trump's legal team may file a motion to move the trial out of Washington, D.C.
3. Trump already has multiple trials scheduled, and the election case may impact the timing of other cases.
Main Topic: Federal prosecutors request restrictions on Donald Trump's public disclosure of evidence in his election case.
Key Points:
1. Prosecutors want sensitive materials to be used by Trump's defense team for trial only.
2. Trump's previous public statements on social media regarding witnesses and others associated with legal matters are a concern.
3. Prosecutors argue that Trump's use of details or grand jury transcripts obtained in discovery could harm witnesses and the fair administration of justice.
Main Topic: Former President Donald Trump's defense attorney argues that Trump's actions may have been a technical violation of the Constitution but not a violation of criminal law.
Key Points:
1. Trump's attorney claims that Trump and Pence had a disagreement over whether a vice president could constitutionally take actions that could overturn a presidential election.
2. The attorney argues that a technical violation of the Constitution is not a violation of criminal law and that constitutional and statutory disagreements do not lead to criminal charges.
3. Trump's defense is based on the belief that he had won the 2020 election and that the charges against him are a violation of his First Amendment rights to express that opinion.
Main Topic: Former President Donald Trump attacks special counsel and judge in 2020 election case.
Key Points:
1. Trump accuses special counsel Jack Smith and Judge Tanya Chutkan of trying to take away his First Amendment rights.
2. Trump calls for Chutkan's recusal from the case.
3. Prosecutors request a protective order to prevent Trump from publicly disclosing evidence.
Main Topic: Donald Trump's lawyers request a narrowed protective order in the special counsel's 2020 election probe.
Key Points:
1. Trump's lawyers argue that the proposed protective order is "overbroad" and request a revised order to shield only genuinely sensitive materials.
2. Prosecutors cite Trump's social media posts as a reason to prohibit him from publicly disclosing certain evidence.
3. Trump criticizes the special counsel and calls for the recusal of Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case.
Main Topic: Former President Donald Trump's response to criminal charges and accusations of his First Amendment rights being violated.
Key Points:
1. Trump vows to talk about the criminal charges he faces and accuses federal prosecutors of taking away his First Amendment rights.
2. Trump's lawyers request a less restrictive protective order to shield sensitive materials in the discovery process.
3. Trump is fighting multiple indictments and using them to rally support for his political movement.
Main Topic: The potential limits on what Donald Trump and his lawyers can say to criticize the federal election fraud case against him, impugn prosecutors, or heap scorn on the judge.
Key Points:
1. The local rules governing federal court in Washington, D.C., are stringent and prohibit lawyers from making public statements about witnesses, guilt or innocence, or the merits of the case.
2. The rules also allow a judge to issue a special order restricting what lawyers and the defendant can say in public in widely publicized or sensational criminal cases.
3. Imposing restrictions on Trump's speech presents a difficult dilemma for Judge Tanya Chutkan, as she must balance Trump's interest as a presidential candidate and the public's interest in hearing his perspective. The red line is likely to be statements that could be perceived as witness tampering or threats.
Main Topic: Discussion of restrictions and protective order before trial on charges related to the 2020 election against Donald Trump.
Key Points:
1. Lawyers for Donald Trump and federal prosecutors will appear in court to discuss restrictions on what information Trump can share about the case.
2. Prosecutors have requested a protective order to limit public sharing of information, citing Trump's statements on social media.
3. Special counsel Jack Smith's team proposed a trial date in January, emphasizing the public's interest in a speedy trial due to the significance of the charges against a former president.
Main Topic: The New York judge overseeing the hush money criminal case against former President Donald Trump refuses to recuse himself.
Key Points:
1. Judge Juan Merchan rejects Trump's attorneys' request for recusal, stating that he is in the best position to appreciate the implications of the case.
2. Trump's attorneys argued that the judge's daughter's political and financial interests created a conflict of interest, but the judge dismissed these claims.
3. The hush money trial is set to begin on March 25, and Trump's lawyers have been seeking to remove Merchan from the case for alleged conflicts.
Main Topic: A Texas woman is detained after threatening a federal judge presiding over Donald Trump's election case.
Key Points:
1. Abigail Jo Shry was arrested and charged with transmitting a threat to injure a person via interstate commerce.
2. Shry left a threatening voicemail message for U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, using racial slurs and making threats against her and others.
3. Security has been increased around Judge Chutkan due to Trump's comments and demands for her recusal.
Main Topic: Former President Donald Trump seeks to delay his federal trial on charges related to his efforts to stop the peaceful transfer of power and retain the White House following his 2020 election loss.
Key Points:
1. Trump's attorneys recommend starting the trial in April 2026, more than two years after prosecutors are seeking to begin.
2. Trump is facing four criminal cases, including the election interference case brought against him by special counsel Jack Smith.
3. U.S. District Judge Tonya Chutkan will set a trial date and has rejected requests from Jan. 6 defendants to move their cases out of Washington, D.C.
Prosecutors in the federal election interference case against Donald Trump are requesting a court order to limit his public statements in order to protect the integrity of the trial and prevent him from undermining confidence in the criminal justice system and prejudicing the jury pool.
U.S. Special Counsel Jack Smith is requesting limits on former President Donald Trump's public statements regarding his court case over the 2020 election, citing concerns about threats, harassment, and inflammatory comments.
Prosecutors in Washington are requesting a limited gag order on Donald Trump to restrict his comments about the case, citing concerns that his remarks could prejudic potential jurors or intimidate witnesses, while hearings for defendants in Georgia and New York are also scheduled.
The latest ruling in the Georgia 2020 election case, which allows two defendants to be tried separately from Donald Trump, could pose significant challenges for the former president, as he will not have a voice in the first trial where his alleged influence over other defendants will be highlighted.
Federal prosecutors are urging the judge overseeing Donald Trump's election interference case to take measures to protect the identity of prospective jurors due to Trump's "continued use of social media as a weapon of intimidation in court proceedings."
A federal judge is considering whether the lawyers for Donald Trump's co-defendants in a case involving obstruction of justice need waivers to continue their defense work due to possible conflicts of interest.
A federal judge is considering whether to impose a limited gag order on Donald Trump in the criminal case related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election, potentially restricting what he can say about trial witnesses and prosecutors.
Former President Donald J. Trump and federal prosecutors have clashed over whether a gag order should be placed on Trump to restrict his statements regarding his federal indictment on charges of conspiring to overturn the 2020 election, highlighting the tension between First Amendment rights and the need to protect witnesses and ensure a fair trial.
A federal judge has imposed a partial gag order on Donald Trump, preventing him from attacking the special counsel, witnesses, the judge herself, and family members, stating that his position as a political candidate does not give him the freedom to vilify or incite violence against those involved in his case.
A court ruling banning Donald Trump from criticizing Democrats demonstrates the erosion of the rule of law in America and the potential for prosecutorial abuse.
A divided panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals narrowly avoided ruling against federal prosecutors in the criminal prosecution of Donald Trump, but the legal battle over the federal obstruction statute used in Jan. 6 prosecutions will continue, with potential repercussions for Trump and other defendants.
Former President Donald Trump could face jail time after failing to comply with a partial gag order in his $250 million civil fraud trial, where he posted an untrue and disparaging comment about the judge's law clerk on social media.
A federal judge temporarily lifts a gag order on Donald Trump in his 2020 election interference case, giving his lawyers time to challenge the restrictions on his comments as the case heads to trial.