Ukraine Aid Debate Should Focus on Costs and Benefits, Not Overall Deficits
-
US spending on Ukraine aid does not pose a major threat to overall US fiscal deficits and debt. It represents only 1.25% of total spending and 0.3% of GDP.
-
There is debate on whether Ukraine aid represents a good use of US resources versus other priorities. Costs and benefits should be weighed.
-
Rising US deficits are a serious fiscal problem, but driven by factors unrelated to Ukraine spending. This should not distract from real issues.
-
US aid has helped diminish Russia's military threat to Europe for a generation, arguably a major security benefit. But alternatives exist.
-
Framing Ukraine support as unaffordable due to US deficits is misleading. The real issue is whether benefits outweigh costs.