Lawyers Call for Investigation of Twitter's Alleged Complicity in Saudi Spying Before Allowing X Banking
-
Lawyers allege Twitter/X should be deemed "unfit" for banking due to alleged complicity in Saudi spying and human rights violations. They cite a lawsuit alleging Twitter shared user data that led to a Saudi activist's imprisonment.
-
The lawyers claim Twitter approved Saudi data requests "in droves" after learning of employee spying in 2016, allegedly to retain Saudi investment and market access.
-
Though the alleged spying predates Musk, lawyers say X's conduct merits investigation before allowing banking, or else Saudi Arabia could gain access to user financial data.
-
X has not commented but previously argued it was also a victim of employee spying. Lawyers dispute this, claiming evidence shows Twitter complicity.
-
The lawyers allege Twitter "sold its corporate soul" to secure Saudi investment and market access, compromising user data protections. They warn of high stakes if no investigation occurs before allowing X banking.