- Capitol Hill is not known for being tech-savvy, but during a recent Senate hearing on AI regulation, legislators showed surprising knowledge and understanding of the topic.
- Senator Richard Blumenthal asked about setting safety breaks on AutoGPT, an AI agent that can carry out complex tasks, to ensure its responsible use.
- Senator Josh Hawley raised concerns about the working conditions of Kenyan workers involved in building safety filters for OpenAI's models.
- The hearing featured testimonies from Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, Stuart Russell, a computer science professor, and Yoshua Bengio, a professor at Université de Montréal.
- This indicates a growing awareness and interest among lawmakers in understanding and regulating AI technology.
### Summary
The California Legislature has unanimously approved an artificial intelligence-drafted resolution to examine and implement regulations on AI use.
### Facts
- 💻 Senate Concurrent Resolution 17 (SCR 17) was introduced by state Sen. Bill Dodd and is the first AI-drafted resolution in the U.S.
- 💡 The resolution aims to ensure responsible AI deployment and use, protecting public rights while leveraging AI benefits.
- ❌ Challenges posed by AI-driven technology include unauthorized data collection and sharing.
- ✅ Potential benefits of AI highlighted in the resolution include increased efficiency in agriculture and revolutionary data analysis for industries.
### Summary
Arati Prabhakar, President Biden's science adviser, is helping guide the U.S. approach to safeguarding AI technology and has been in conversation with Biden about artificial intelligence.
### Facts
- 🗣️ Prabhakar has had multiple conversations with President Biden about artificial intelligence, focusing on understanding its implications and taking action.
- ⚖️ Prabhakar acknowledges that making AI models explainable is difficult due to their opaque and black box nature but believes it is possible to ensure their safety and effectiveness by learning from the journey of pharmaceuticals.
- 😟 Prabhakar is concerned about the misuse of AI, such as chatbots being manipulated to provide instructions on building weapons and the bias and privacy issues associated with facial recognition systems.
- 💼 Seven major tech companies, including Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI, have agreed to meet voluntary AI safety standards set by the White House, but Prabhakar emphasizes the need for government involvement and accountability measures.
- 📅 There is no specific timeline provided, but Prabhakar states that President Biden considers AI an urgent issue and expects actions to be taken quickly.
### Summary
President Joe Biden consults with Arati Prabhakar, his science adviser, on matters related to artificial intelligence (AI). Prabhakar is working with major tech companies like Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and Meta to shape the U.S. approach to safeguarding AI technology.
### Facts
- 🤖 Prabhakar has had several discussions with President Biden on artificial intelligence.
- 📚 Making AI models explainable is a priority for Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, but it is technically challenging.
- 💡 Prabhakar believes that despite the opacity of deep-learning AI systems, we can learn enough about their safety and effectiveness to leverage their value.
- ⚠️ Concerns include chatbots being coerced into providing instructions for building weapons, biases in AI systems trained on human data, wrongful arrests from facial recognition systems, and privacy issues.
- 💼 Seven companies, including Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI, voluntarily committed to AI safety standards, but more companies need to step up, and government action is necessary.
- ⏰ Timeline for future actions is fast, according to Prabhakar, as President Biden has made it clear that AI is an urgent issue.
### Summary
President Joe Biden turns to his science adviser, Arati Prabhakar, for guidance on artificial intelligence (AI) and relies on cooperation from big tech firms. Prabhakar emphasizes the importance of understanding the consequences and implications of AI while taking action.
### Facts
- Prabhakar has had several conversations with President Biden about AI, which are exploratory and action-oriented.
- Despite the opacity of deep-learning, machine-learning systems, Prabhakar believes that like pharmaceuticals, there are ways to ensure the safety and effectiveness of AI systems.
- Concerns regarding AI applications include the ability to coax chatbots into providing instructions for building weapons, biases in trained systems, wrongful arrests related to facial recognition, and privacy concerns.
- Several tech companies, including Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI, have committed to meeting voluntary AI safety standards set by the White House, but there is still friction due to market constraints.
- Future actions, including a potential Biden executive order, are under consideration with a focus on fast implementation and enforceable accountability measures.
🔬 Prabhakar advises President Biden on AI and encourages action and understanding.
🛡️ Prabhakar believes that despite their opacity, AI systems can be made safe and effective, resembling the journey of pharmaceuticals.
⚠️ Concerns regarding AI include weapon-building instructions, biases in trained systems, wrongful arrests, and privacy issues.
🤝 Tech companies have committed to voluntary AI safety standards but face market constraints.
⏰ Future actions, including potential executive orders, are being considered with an emphasis on prompt implementation and enforceable accountability measures.
President Joe Biden relies on his science adviser Arati Prabhakar to guide the US approach to safeguarding AI technology, with cooperation from tech giants like Amazon, Google, Microsoft and Meta. Prabhakar discusses the need for understanding the implications and consequences of AI, the challenge of making AI models explainable, concerns about biases and privacy, and the importance of voluntary commitments from tech companies along with government actions.
A new poll conducted by the AI Policy Institute reveals that 72 percent of American voters want to slow down the development of AI, signaling a divergence between elite opinion and public opinion on the technology. Additionally, the poll shows that 82 percent of American voters do not trust AI companies to self-regulate. To address these concerns, the AI Now Institute has proposed a framework called "Zero Trust AI Governance," which calls for lawmakers to vigorously enforce existing laws, establish bold and easily administrable rules, and place the burden of proof on companies to demonstrate the safety of their AI systems.
Congress should prioritize maintaining bipartisan commitment to AI, generating global AI guardrails, and seeking out local perspectives in order to develop effective and responsible AI policies.
AI-generated inventions need to be allowed patent protection to encourage innovation and maximize social benefits, as current laws hinder progress in biomedicine; jurisdictions around the world have differing approaches to patenting AI-generated inventions, and the US falls behind in this area, highlighting the need for legislative action.
The U.S. is falling behind in regulating artificial intelligence (AI), while Europe has passed the world's first comprehensive AI law; President Joe Biden recently met with industry leaders to discuss the need for AI regulation and companies pledged to develop safeguards for AI-generated content and prioritize user privacy.
The use of AI algorithms by insurance companies to assess claims is raising concerns about potential bias and lack of human oversight, leading Pennsylvania legislators to propose legislation that would regulate the use of AI in claims processing.
Salesforce has released an AI Acceptable Use Policy that outlines the restrictions on the use of its generative AI products, including prohibiting their use for weapons development, adult content, profiling based on protected characteristics, medical or legal advice, and more. The policy emphasizes the need for responsible innovation and sets clear ethical guidelines for the use of AI.
In his book, Tom Kemp argues for the need to regulate AI and suggests measures such as AI impact assessments, AI certifications, codes of conduct, and industry standards to protect consumers and ensure AI's positive impact on society.
Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer's AI forum, which includes top tech executives and labor and civil rights advocates, will help inform his efforts to craft bipartisan legislation regulating AI.
The UK government has been urged to introduce new legislation to regulate artificial intelligence (AI) in order to keep up with the European Union (EU) and the United States, as the EU advances with the AI Act and US policymakers publish frameworks for AI regulations. The government's current regulatory approach risks lagging behind the fast pace of AI development, according to a report by the science, innovation, and technology committee. The report highlights 12 governance challenges, including bias in AI systems and the production of deepfake material, that need to be addressed in order to guide the upcoming global AI safety summit at Bletchley Park.
Several tech giants in the US, including Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta Platforms, and Amazon, have pledged to collaborate with the Biden administration to address the risks associated with artificial intelligence, focusing on safety, security, and trust in AI development.
Mustafa Suleyman, CEO of Inflection AI, argues that restricting the sale of AI technologies and appointing a cabinet-level regulator are necessary steps to combat the negative effects of artificial intelligence and prevent misuse.
Congressman Clay Higgins (R-LA) plans to introduce legislation prohibiting the use of artificial intelligence (AI) by the federal government for law enforcement purposes, in response to the Internal Revenue Service's recently announced AI-driven tax enforcement initiative.
Eight big tech companies, including Adobe, IBM, Salesforce, and Nvidia, have pledged to conduct more testing and research on the risks of artificial intelligence (AI) in a meeting with White House officials, signaling a "bridge" to future government action on the issue. These voluntary commitments come amidst congressional scrutiny and ongoing efforts by the White House to develop policies for AI.
Eight more companies, including Adobe, IBM, Palantir, Nvidia, and Salesforce, have pledged to voluntarily follow safety, security, and trust standards for artificial intelligence (AI) technology, joining the initiative led by Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and others, as concerns about the impact of AI continue to grow.
The CEOs of several influential tech companies, including Google, IBM, Microsoft, and OpenAI, will meet with federal lawmakers as the US Senate prepares to draft legislation regulating the AI industry, reflecting policymakers' growing awareness of the potential disruptions and risks associated with AI technology.
California Senator Scott Wiener is introducing a bill to regulate artificial intelligence (AI) in the state, aiming to establish transparency requirements, legal liability, and security measures for advanced AI systems. The bill also proposes setting up a state research cloud called "CalCompute" to support AI development outside of big industry.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk suggests the need for government regulation of artificial intelligence, even proposing the creation of a Department of AI, during a gathering of tech CEOs in Washington. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and other attendees also expressed the view that government should play a role in regulating AI. The options for regulation range from a standalone department to leveraging existing agencies, but the debate is expected to continue in the coming months.
The nation's top tech executives, including Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Sundar Pichai, showed support for government regulations on artificial intelligence during a closed-door meeting in the U.S. Senate, although there is little consensus on what those regulations should entail and the political path for legislation remains challenging.
Senator Josh Hawley criticizes the closed-door meeting between big tech CEOs and lawmakers, warning that they may use AI technology to censor conservatives and interfere in elections.
A Senate subcommittee convened to discuss the need for greater accountability and transparency in the development and deployment of AI to ensure responsible adoption and use, with recommendations including standardized documentation, content labeling, and an AI trust infrastructure.
A bipartisan group of senators is expected to introduce legislation to create a government agency to regulate AI and require AI models to obtain a license before deployment, a move that some leading technology companies have supported; however, critics argue that licensing regimes and a new AI regulator could hinder innovation and concentrate power among existing players, similar to the undesirable economic consequences seen in Europe.
The Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Information Technology, and Government Innovation discussed the federal government's use of artificial intelligence (AI) and emphasized the need for responsible governance, oversight, and accountability to mitigate risks and protect civil liberties and privacy rights.
A new poll reveals that 63% of American voters believe regulation should actively prevent the development of superintelligent AI, challenging the assumption that artificial general intelligence (AGI) should exist. The public is increasingly questioning the potential risks and costs associated with AGI, highlighting the need for democratic input and oversight in the development of transformative technologies.
While many experts are concerned about the existential risks posed by AI, Mustafa Suleyman, cofounder of DeepMind, believes that the focus should be on more practical issues like regulation, privacy, bias, and online moderation. He is confident that governments can effectively regulate AI by applying successful frameworks from past technologies, although critics argue that current internet regulations are flawed and insufficiently hold big tech companies accountable. Suleyman emphasizes the importance of limiting AI's ability to improve itself and establishing clear boundaries and oversight to ensure enforceable laws. Several governments, including the European Union and China, are already working on AI regulations.
Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales believes that regulating artificial intelligence (AI) is not feasible and compares the idea to "magical thinking," stating that many politicians lack a strong understanding of AI and its potential. While the UN is establishing a panel to investigate global regulation of AI, some experts, including physicist Reinhard Scholl, emphasize the need for regulation to prevent the misuse of AI by bad actors, while others, like Robert Opp, suggest forming a regulatory body similar to the International Civil Aviation Organisation. However, Wales argues that regulating individual developers using freely available AI software is impractical.
Senate Minority Whip John Thune is partnering with Sen. Amy Klobuchar to introduce legislation that would require companies to assess the impact of artificial intelligence systems and self-certify their safety, in contrast to what Thune believes will be a more heavy-handed approach proposed by Sen. Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.
The U.S. government must establish regulations and enforce standards to ensure the safety and security of artificial intelligence (AI) development, including requiring developers to demonstrate the safety of their systems before deployment, according to Anthony Aguirre, the executive director and secretary of the board at the Future of Life Institute.
Sen. Mark Warner, a U.S. Senator from Virginia, is urging Congress to take a less ambitious approach to regulating artificial intelligence (AI), suggesting that lawmakers should focus on narrowly focused issues rather than trying to address the full spectrum of AI risks with a single comprehensive law. Warner believes that tackling immediate concerns, such as AI-generated deepfakes, is a more realistic and effective approach to regulation. He also emphasizes the need for bipartisan agreement and action to demonstrate progress in the regulation of AI, especially given Congress's previous failures in addressing issues related to social media.
Minnesota Democrats are calling for regulations on artificial intelligence (AI) in elections, expressing concerns about the potential for AI to deceive and manipulate voters, while also acknowledging its potential benefits for efficiency and productivity in election administration.
AI leaders including Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai, Microsoft president Brad Smith, and OpenAI's Sam Altman are supporting AI regulation to ensure investment security, unified rules, and a role in shaping legislation, as regulations also benefit consumers by ensuring safety, cracking down on scams and discrimination, and eliminating bias.
