1. Home
  2. >
  3. AI 🤖
Posted

Cybersecurity Skills Shortage Drives Need for AI, Better Communication with Leadership

  • The cybersecurity skills shortage continues to worsen, with 71% of professionals reporting their organizations have been impacted. This has led to increased workloads, unfilled roles, and burnout.

  • Artificial intelligence, particularly generative AI, has potential to help address the shortage by automating tasks, aiding analysts, and training new hires. However, it is still early and skepticism remains about real-world effectiveness.

  • Organizations can attract talent by increasing compensation, offering incentives like certifications and training, and casting a wider net for skills like problem-solving rather than narrow cyber expertise.

  • Tapping into the existing workforce, even those not in cyber roles, can help uncover "hidden" cyber talent within the organization to fill gaps.

  • Business leaders need to better understand cybersecurity needs and strategy from CISOs and security leaders to enable acquiring necessary skills. Better communication in business terms is key.

cnbc.com
Relevant topic timeline:
Main topic: Artificial intelligence's impact on cybersecurity Key points: 1. AI is being used by cybercriminals to launch more sophisticated attacks. 2. Cybersecurity teams are using AI to protect their systems and data. 3. AI introduces new risks, such as model poisoning and data privacy concerns, but also offers benefits in identifying threats and mitigating insider threats.
Main topic: The role of artificial intelligence (AI) in cybersecurity and the need for regulation. Key points: 1. AI-powered cybersecurity tools automate tasks, enhance threat detection, and improve defense mechanisms. 2. AI brings advantages such as rapid analysis of data and continuous learning and adaptation. 3. Challenges include potential vulnerabilities, privacy concerns, ethical considerations, and regulatory compliance. Note: While there are seven questions in the provided text, it is not possible to limit the key points to just three within the given context.
### Summary Generative AI tools are being adopted rapidly by businesses, but organizations must establish safeguards to protect sensitive data, ensure customer privacy, and avoid regulatory violations. ### Facts - The use of generative AI tools poses risks such as AI errors, malicious attacks, and potential exposure of sensitive data. - Samsung's semiconductor division experienced trade secrets leaks after engineers used ChatGPT, a generative AI platform developed by OpenAI. - Organizations are embracing genAI tools to increase revenue, drive innovation, and improve employee productivity. - Privacy and data protection, inaccurate outputs, and cybersecurity risks are among the main challenges organizations face when using genAI. - Risk management strategies for genAI include defining policies for acceptable use, implementing input content filters, and ensuring data privacy and protection. - Users should be cautious of prompt injection attacks and implement strong security measures to protect against potential breaches. - Despite the risks, the advantages of using AI tools, such as increased productivity, innovation, and automation, outweigh the potential drawbacks. ### Emoji 🤖
### Summary AI cybersecurity systems will play an increasingly important role in the future, leading to the emergence of AI CISOs who will have authority over the tactics, strategies, and resource priorities of organizations. However, there are potential risks and challenges associated with this development, including loss of human expertise, over-reliance on AI systems, and the need for governance and responsible practices in the field of cybersecurity. ### Facts - AI is already deployed by over a third of companies, with many more considering its potential uses. - The discourse about the utility of AI in cybersecurity often separates the roles of human operators and machine systems. - AI CISOs will become de facto authorities on the tactics, strategies, and resource priorities of organizations. - AI-augmented cyber campaigns are becoming more common, leading to the need for AI CISOs to counter rising offensive AI threats. - The use of AI CISOs can improve efficiency and standardize knowledge about cyber defense practices. - There is a potential for missteps and negative externalities in the implementation of AI CISOs, including loss of human expertise and over-assigning positive qualities to AI systems. - The emergence of AI CISOs requires careful planning, engagement in cyberpsychological research, and the establishment of a workforce culture focused on adversarial oversight. - Inter-industry learning and responsible practices are crucial to avoid pitfalls and ensure the success of AI CISOs in the future.
As AI systems become more involved in cybersecurity, the roles of human CISOs and AI will evolve, leading to the emergence of AI CISOs who will be de facto authorities on the tactics, strategies, and resource priorities of organizations, but careful planning and oversight are needed to avoid potential missteps and ensure the symbiosis between humans and machines is beneficial.
Professionals are optimistic about the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on their productivity and view it as an augmentation to their work rather than a complete replacement, according to a report by Thomson Reuters, with concerns centered around compromised accuracy and data security.
Cybercriminals are increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI) to create advanced email threats, while organizations are turning to AI-enabled email security systems to combat these attacks. The perception of AI's importance in email security has significantly shifted, with the majority of organizations recognizing its crucial role in protecting against AI-enhanced attacks. Strengthening email defenses with AI is vital, and organizations are also looking to extend AI-powered security to other communication and collaboration platforms.
Entrepreneurs and CEOs can gain a competitive edge by incorporating generative AI into their businesses, allowing for expanded product offerings, increased employee productivity, more accurate market trend predictions, but they must be cautious of the limitations and ethical concerns of relying too heavily on AI.
Generative AI and large language models (LLMs) have the potential to revolutionize the security industry by enhancing code writing, threat analysis, and team productivity, but organizations must also consider the responsible use of these technologies to prevent malicious actors from exploiting them for nefarious purposes.
Generative AI will become a crucial aspect of software engineering leadership, with over half of all software engineering leader role descriptions expected to explicitly require oversight of generative AI by 2025, according to analysts at Gartner. This expansion of responsibility will include team management, talent management, business development, ethics enforcement, and AI governance.
A new report from recruitment giant Randstad reveals that while there is a significant increase in job postings requiring skills in generative AI, there is a skills gap with only one in 10 workers being offered AI training opportunities, highlighting the need for employers to step up and fill this gap. Furthermore, the report indicates that businesses may be losing out on top talent, particularly Gen Z employees, by not providing AI training, and that employers have a responsibility to help create the talent of the future.
AI is being discussed by CEOs behind closed doors as a solution to various challenges, including cybersecurity, shopping efficiency, and video conferencing.
As generative AI continues to gain attention and interest, business leaders must also focus on other areas of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and automation to effectively lead and adapt to new challenges and opportunities.
Emerging technologies, particularly AI, pose a threat to job security and salary levels for many workers, but individuals can futureproof their careers by adapting to AI and automation, upskilling their soft skills, and staying proactive and intentional about their professional growth and learning.
Artificial intelligence (AI) requires leadership from business executives and a dedicated and diverse AI team to ensure effective implementation and governance, with roles focusing on ethics, legal, security, and training data quality becoming increasingly important.
Nearly half of CEOs (49%) believe that artificial intelligence (AI) could replace most or all of their roles, and 47% think it would be beneficial, according to a survey from online education platform edX. However, executives also acknowledged that "soft skills" defining a good CEO, such as critical thinking and collaboration, would be difficult for AI to replicate. Additionally, the survey found that 49% of existing skills in the current workforce may not be relevant by 2025, with 47% of workers unprepared for the future.
Generative AI is expected to have a significant impact on jobs, with some roles benefiting from enhanced job quality and growth, while others face disruption and a shift in required skills, according to a report from the World Economic Forum. The integration of AI into the workforce brings mixed reactions but emphasizes the need for proactive measures to maximize benefits and minimize risks. Additionally, the report highlights the importance of a balanced workforce that values both technical AI skills and people skills for future success.
Advances in artificial intelligence are making AI a possible threat to the job security of millions of workers, with around 47% of total U.S. employment at risk, and jobs in various industries, including office support, legal, architecture, engineering, and sales, becoming potentially obsolete.
AI: Will It Replace Humans in the Workplace? Summary: The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has raised concerns that it could potentially replace human workers in various industries. While some believe that AI tools like ChatGPT are still unreliable and require human involvement, there are still underlying factors that suggest AI could threaten job security. One interesting development is the use of invasive monitoring apps by corporations to collect data on employee behavior. This data could be used to train AI programs that can eventually replace workers. Whether through direct interaction or passive data collection, workers might inadvertently train AI programs to take over their jobs. While some jobs may not be completely replaced, displacement could still lead to lower-paying positions. Policymakers will need to address the potential destabilization of the economy and society by offering social safety net programs and effective retraining initiatives. The advancement of AI technology should not be underestimated, as it could bring unforeseen disruptions to the job market in the future.
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are expected to disrupt professions, boost productivity, and transform business workflows, according to Marco Argenti, the Chief Information Officer at Goldman Sachs, who believes that companies are already seeing practical results from AI and expecting real gains. AI can enhance productivity, change the nature of certain professions, and expand the universe of use cases, particularly when applied to business processes and workflows. However, Argenti also highlighted the potential risks associated with AI, such as social engineering and the generation of toxic content.
The journey to AI security consists of six steps: expanding analysis of threats, broadening response mechanisms, securing the data supply chain, using AI to scale efforts, being transparent, and creating continuous improvements.
The National Security Agency is establishing an artificial intelligence security center to protect U.S. defense and intelligence systems from the increasing threat of AI capabilities being acquired, developed, and integrated by adversaries such as China and Russia.
Experts fear that corporations using advanced software to monitor employees could be training artificial intelligence (AI) to replace human roles in the workforce.
Security concerns are a top priority for businesses integrating generative AI tools, with 49% of leaders citing safety and security risks as their main worry, but the benefits of early adoption outweigh the downsides, according to Jason Rader, CISO at Insight Enterprises. To ensure safe use, companies should establish and continuously update safe-use policies and involve stakeholders from across the business to address unique security risks. Additionally, allowing citizen developers to access AI tools can help identify use cases and refine outputs.
To overcome the fear of becoming obsolete due to AI, individuals must continuously learn and acquire new skills, be adaptable, embrace human qualities, develop interdisciplinary skills, enhance problem-solving abilities, network effectively, adopt an entrepreneurial mindset, and view AI as a tool to augment productivity rather than replace jobs.
CEOs prioritize investments in generative AI, but there are concerns about the allocation of capital, ethical challenges, cybersecurity risks, and the lack of regulation in the AI landscape.
The responsibility of determining how generative AI innovations will be implemented across the economy lies with all individuals, from AI experts to finance professionals, who should have a baseline understanding of responsible AI and contribute to the decision-making process, according to experts. The National Institute for Standards and Technology has released an AI risk management framework to guide organizations in reducing discrimination, increasing transparency, and ensuring trustworthiness in AI systems. CEOs and executive committees must take responsibility for assessing the use of AI within their organizations, and strong governance is essential for successful implementation. Additionally, concerns about the impact of AI on the workforce can be addressed through training programs that focus on responsible AI practices.
Generative AI is disrupting various industries with its transformative power, offering real-world use cases such as drug discovery in life sciences and optimizing drilling paths in the oil and gas industry, but organizations need to carefully manage the risks associated with integration complexity, legal compliance, model flaws, workforce disruption, reputational risks, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities to ensure responsible adoption and maximize the potential of generative AI.
A new study shows that executives are optimistic about the rise of generative AI in the workplace and believe that human roles will remain central in the workforce.
Companies are increasingly creating the role of chief AI officer to advocate for safe and effective AI practices, with responsibilities including understanding and applying AI technologies, ensuring safety and ethical considerations, and delivering quantifiable results.
The field of cybersecurity is experiencing significant growth, with AI-powered products playing a crucial role, but AI will eventually surpass human defenders in handling critical incidents and making high-stake decisions. However, human involvement will still be necessary to train, supervise, and monitor the AI systems. It is important for humans to set the right parameters and ensure accurate data input for AI to function effectively. As AI becomes part of the cybersecurity architecture, protecting AI from threats and attacks will become a crucial responsibility. The rise of AI in cybersecurity will require the industry to adapt and evolve to a greater degree.
Nearly half of the skills in today's workforce will be irrelevant in two years due to artificial intelligence, according to a survey of executives and employees by edX, an online education platform. Executives predict that AI will eliminate over half of entry-level knowledge worker roles within five years, but some industry leaders believe the immediate impact of AI on career goals will be minimal. While AI will redirect jobs and career prospects, the impact on tasks is uncertain, and developing skills in AI tools and technologies can enhance one's existing strengths. Ultimately, successful applications of AI will amplify human skills rather than replace them entirely. However, the survey shows that even top-level decision-makers are concerned about their tasks being absorbed into AI, with a significant percentage believing that the CEO role should be automated or replaced by AI. As AI evolves, skills such as critical thinking, logical intelligence, and interpersonal skills will become more important, while repetitive tasks, analysis, and content generation will be less in demand. Executives recognize the importance of improving their AI skills and fear being unprepared for the future of work if they don't adapt. While AI can support various business activities, including idea generation and data-driven decision-making, there will always be a role for creativity and strategic thinking that cannot be easily replaced by AI.
Companies globally are recognizing the potential of AI and are eager to implement AI systems, but the real challenge lies in cultivating an AI mindset within their organization and effectively introducing it to their workforce, while also being aware that true AI applications go beyond simple analytics systems and require a long-term investment rather than expecting immediate returns.
Artificial intelligence is described as a "double-edged sword" in terms of government cybersecurity, with both advantages and disadvantages, according to former NSA director Mike Rogers and other industry experts, as it offers greater knowledge about adversaries while also increasing the ability for entities to infiltrate systems.
Younger employees, including digital natives, are struggling to keep up with the demands of the AI era and are lacking the necessary skills, with 65% of Gen Z employees admitting that they do not possess the required skills to meet AI's demands. The key to unlocking AI's productivity gains lies in treating it as a direct report rather than just a search engine, prioritizing complex tasks and clear communication. Organizations need to invest in employee skilling to prepare them for the AI-powered future.
Generative AI tools have the potential to transform software development and engineering, but they are not an immediate threat to human professionals and should be viewed as a complement to their work, according to industry experts. While some tasks may be automated, the creative responsibility and control of developers will still be necessary. Educating personnel about the opportunities and risks of generative AI is crucial, and organizations should establish responsible guidelines and guardrails to ensure innovation is promoted securely.