The use of copyrighted works to train generative AI models, such as Meta's LLaMA, is raising concerns about copyright infringement and transparency, with potential legal consequences and a looming "day of reckoning" for the datasets used.
Generative AI is starting to impact the animation and visual effects industry, with companies like Base Media exploring its potentials, but concerns about job security and copyright infringement remain.
Summary: AI ethics refers to the system of moral principles and professional practices used to guide the development and use of artificial intelligence technology, with top concerns for marketers including job security, privacy, bias and discrimination, misinformation and disinformation, and intellectual property issues, and there are five steps that can be taken to maintain ethical AI practices within teams and organizations.
Three artists, including concept artist Karla Ortiz, are suing AI art generators Stability AI, Midjourney, and DeviantArt for using their work to train generative AI systems without their consent, in a case that could test the boundaries of copyright law and impact the way AI systems are built. The artists argue that feeding copyrighted works into AI systems constitutes intellectual property theft, while AI companies claim fair use protection. The outcome could determine the legality of training large language models on copyrighted material.
A federal judge has ruled that works created by artificial intelligence (A.I.) are not covered by copyrights, stating that copyright law is designed to incentivize human creativity, not non-human actors. This ruling has implications for the future role of A.I. in the music industry and the monetization of works created by A.I. tools.
The Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers has proposed guidelines for the usage of artificial intelligence (AI) and data transparency in the entertainment industry, stating that AI-created material cannot be considered literary or intellectually protected, and ensuring that credit, rights, and compensation for AI-generated scripts are given to the original human writer or reworker.
Lawyers must trust their technology experts to determine the appropriate use cases for AI technology, as some law firms are embracing AI without understanding its limits or having defined pain points to solve.
AI-based tools are being widely used in hiring processes, but they pose a significant risk of exacerbating discrimination in the workplace, leading to calls for their regulation and the implementation of third-party assessments and transparency in their use.
Major media organizations are calling for new laws to protect their content from being used by AI tools without permission, expressing concerns over unauthorized scraping and the potential for AI to produce false or biased information.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to deliver significant productivity gains, but its current adoption may further consolidate the dominance of Big Tech companies, raising concerns among antitrust authorities.
The use of AI algorithms by insurance companies to assess claims is raising concerns about potential bias and lack of human oversight, leading Pennsylvania legislators to propose legislation that would regulate the use of AI in claims processing.
The advent of artificial intelligence is driving new mergers and acquisitions in the legal profession and increasing efficiency across industries.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is seen as a tool that can inspire and collaborate with human creatives in the movie and TV industry, but concerns remain about copyright and ethical issues, according to Greg Harrison, chief creative officer at MOCEAN. Although AI has potential for visual brainstorming and automation of non-creative tasks, it should be used cautiously and in a way that values human creativity and culture.
A survey found that most Americans believe there is racial bias in corporate hiring practices, and many believe that artificial intelligence (AI) could help improve equality in hiring, although skepticism remains, particularly among Black Americans; however, concerns about the ethical use of AI remain due to biases in AI systems that favor white, male, heterosexual, able-bodied candidates. Hackajob, a UK-based hiring platform, has introduced features to increase diversity and reduce bias in tech teams, while experts emphasize the importance of addressing bias in AI datasets through diverse data collection and involving underrepresented groups in AI system development.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has settled a case against iTutorGroup, Inc. and two affiliated companies for age discrimination in their use of AI, marking the first recovery by the EEOC in a case involving discriminatory use of AI, and highlighting the need for employers to be cautious in their use of AI in employment-related decisions.
The American Bar Association is forming a new group to assess the impact of artificial intelligence on the practice of law and to address ethical questions surrounding the technology.
The rapid integration of AI technologies into workflows is causing potential controversies and creating a "ticking time bomb" for businesses, as AI tools often produce inaccurate or biased content and lack proper regulations, leaving companies vulnerable to confusion and lawsuits.
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools can put human rights at risk, as highlighted by researchers from Amnesty International on the Me, Myself, and AI podcast, who discuss scenarios in which AI is used to track activists and make automated decisions that can lead to discrimination and inequality, emphasizing the need for human intervention and changes in public policy to address these issues.
The United States Copyright Office has issued a notice of inquiry seeking public comment on copyright and artificial intelligence (AI), specifically on issues related to the content AI produces and how it should be treated when it imitates or mimics human artists.
“A Recent Entrance to Paradise” is a pixelated artwork created by an artificial intelligence called DABUS in 2012. However, its inventor, Stephen Thaler, has been denied copyright for the work by a judge in the US. This decision has sparked a series of legal battles in different countries, as Thaler believes that DABUS, his AI system, is sentient and should be recognized as an inventor. These lawsuits raise important questions about intellectual property and the rights of AI systems. While Thaler's main supporter argues that machine inventions should be protected to encourage social good, Thaler himself sees these cases as a way to raise awareness about the existence of a new species. The debate revolves around whether AI systems can be considered creators and should be granted copyright and patent rights. Some argue that copyright requires human authorship, while others believe that intellectual property rights should be granted regardless of the involvement of a human inventor or author. The outcome of these legal battles could have significant implications for the future of AI-generated content and the definition of authorship.
UK publishers have called on the prime minister to protect authors' intellectual property rights in relation to artificial intelligence systems, as OpenAI argues that authors suing them for using their work to train AI systems have misconceived the scope of US copyright law.
The UK government is at risk of contempt of court if it fails to improve its response to requests for transparency about the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in vetting welfare claims, according to the information commissioner. The government has been accused of maintaining secrecy over the use of AI algorithms to detect fraud and error in universal credit claims, and it has refused freedom of information requests and blocked MPs' questions on the matter. Child poverty campaigners have expressed concerns about the potential devastating impact on children if benefits are suspended.
A taskforce established by the UK Trade Union Congress (TUC) aims to develop legislation to protect workers from the negative impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace, focusing on issues such as privacy infringement and potential discrimination. The TUC taskforce plans to produce a draft law next spring, with the support of both Labour and Conservative officials, aimed at ensuring fair and just application of AI technologies.
The use of AI in the entertainment industry, such as body scans and generative AI systems, raises concerns about workers' rights, intellectual property, and the potential for broader use of AI in other industries, infringing on human connection and privacy.
The digital transformation driven by artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning will have a significant impact on various sectors, including healthcare, cybersecurity, and communications, and has the potential to alter how we live and work in the future. However, ethical concerns and responsible oversight are necessary to ensure the positive and balanced development of AI technology.
Microsoft will pay legal damages on behalf of customers using its artificial intelligence products if they are sued for copyright infringement for the output generated by such systems, as long as customers use the built-in "guardrails and content filters" to reduce the likelihood of generating infringing content.
State attorneys general, including Oklahoma's Attorney General Gentner Drummond, are urging Congress to address the consequences of artificial intelligence on child pornography, expressing concern that AI-powered tools are making prosecution more challenging and creating new opportunities for abuse.
Adobe has joined other companies in committing to safe AI development and has proposed a federal anti-impersonation law that would allow creators to seek damages from individuals using AI to impersonate them or their style for commercial purposes, which would make the impersonator, not the tool's vendor, the target of legal action.
Authors, including Michael Chabon, are filing class action lawsuits against Meta and OpenAI, alleging copyright infringement for using their books to train artificial intelligence systems without permission, seeking the destruction of AI systems trained on their works.
Microsoft will assume responsibility for potential legal risks arising from copyright infringement claims related to the use of its AI products and will provide indemnification coverage to customers.
Artificial Intelligence poses real threats due to its newness and rawness, such as ethical challenges, regulatory and legal challenges, bias and fairness issues, lack of transparency, privacy concerns, safety and security risks, energy consumption, data privacy and ownership, job loss or displacement, explainability problems, and managing hype and expectations.
The use of AI in the film industry has sparked a labor dispute between actors' union SAG-AFTRA and studios, with concerns being raised about the potential for AI to digitally replicate actors' images without fair compensation, according to British actor Stephen Fry.
Artificial intelligence (AI) requires leadership from business executives and a dedicated and diverse AI team to ensure effective implementation and governance, with roles focusing on ethics, legal, security, and training data quality becoming increasingly important.
The Authors Guild, representing prominent fiction authors, has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging copyright infringement and the unauthorized use of their works to train AI models like ChatGPT, which generates summaries and analyses of their novels, interfering with their economic prospects. This case could determine the legality of using copyrighted material to train AI systems.
The use of generative AI poses risks to businesses, including the potential exposure of sensitive information, the generation of false information, and the potential for biased or toxic responses from chatbots. Additionally, copyright concerns and the complexity of these systems further complicate the landscape.
The US Copyright Office has ruled for the third time that AI-generated art cannot be copyrighted, raising questions about whether AI-generated art is categorically excluded from copyright protection or if human creators should be listed as the image's creator. The office's position, which is based on existing copyright doctrine, has been criticized for being unscalable and a potential quagmire, as it fails to consider the creative choices made by AI systems similar to those made by human photographers.
