Queens Woman Sues Starbucks for $5M Over Deceptive Fruit Drink Labeling
-
Queens woman sues Starbucks for $5M, alleging fruit drinks contained no real fruit as advertised. Lawsuit can proceed after judge rejects Starbucks' attempt to dismiss.
-
Suit claims drinks like Strawberry Acai Refresher had no acai berries, deceiving customers expecting nutritional benefits.
-
Lawyer leading case known for lawsuits against food companies for misleading labeling. Recently settled $2.6M suit against Blue Diamond almond milk.
-
Starbucks says fruit names just "describe flavors" not actual ingredients. But judge said terms imply real fruit to customers.
-
Growing scrutiny of deceptive fruit labeling at U.S. supermarkets. Lawyer warns more suits likely against companies misleading consumers.