Judge Allows Lawsuit Against Starbucks Over Misleading Refresher Drink Names to Proceed
-
A U.S. district court judge ruled 9 causes of action will remain active in a lawsuit against Starbucks over its Refresher drinks.
-
The lawsuit claims Starbucks engaged in false marketing by naming the drinks after fruits they do not contain.
-
Starbucks tried to get the lawsuit dismissed but the judge rejected most of their arguments.
-
The judge said the drink names could potentially mislead consumers about the ingredients.
-
Starbucks has offered Refresher drinks for over a decade and says the names refer to flavors, not ingredients.