### Summary
Arati Prabhakar, President Biden's science adviser, is helping guide the U.S. approach to safeguarding AI technology and has been in conversation with Biden about artificial intelligence.
### Facts
- 🗣️ Prabhakar has had multiple conversations with President Biden about artificial intelligence, focusing on understanding its implications and taking action.
- ⚖️ Prabhakar acknowledges that making AI models explainable is difficult due to their opaque and black box nature but believes it is possible to ensure their safety and effectiveness by learning from the journey of pharmaceuticals.
- 😟 Prabhakar is concerned about the misuse of AI, such as chatbots being manipulated to provide instructions on building weapons and the bias and privacy issues associated with facial recognition systems.
- 💼 Seven major tech companies, including Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI, have agreed to meet voluntary AI safety standards set by the White House, but Prabhakar emphasizes the need for government involvement and accountability measures.
- 📅 There is no specific timeline provided, but Prabhakar states that President Biden considers AI an urgent issue and expects actions to be taken quickly.
President Joe Biden relies on his science adviser Arati Prabhakar to guide the US approach to safeguarding AI technology, with cooperation from tech giants like Amazon, Google, Microsoft and Meta. Prabhakar discusses the need for understanding the implications and consequences of AI, the challenge of making AI models explainable, concerns about biases and privacy, and the importance of voluntary commitments from tech companies along with government actions.
The use of AI algorithms by insurance companies to assess claims is raising concerns about potential bias and lack of human oversight, leading Pennsylvania legislators to propose legislation that would regulate the use of AI in claims processing.
The UK government is at risk of contempt of court if it fails to improve its response to requests for transparency about the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in vetting welfare claims, according to the information commissioner. The government has been accused of maintaining secrecy over the use of AI algorithms to detect fraud and error in universal credit claims, and it has refused freedom of information requests and blocked MPs' questions on the matter. Child poverty campaigners have expressed concerns about the potential devastating impact on children if benefits are suspended.
The rapid advancement of AI technology poses significant challenges for democratic societies, including the need for nuanced debates, public engagement, and ethical considerations in regulating AI to mitigate unintended consequences.
Google will require verified election advertisers to disclose when their ads have been digitally altered, including through the use of artificial intelligence (AI), in an effort to promote transparency and responsible political advertising.
Congressman Clay Higgins (R-LA) plans to introduce legislation prohibiting the use of artificial intelligence (AI) by the federal government for law enforcement purposes, in response to the Internal Revenue Service's recently announced AI-driven tax enforcement initiative.
Senators Richard Blumenthal and Josh Hawley are holding a hearing to discuss legislation on regulating artificial intelligence (AI), with a focus on protecting against potential dangers posed by AI and improving transparency and public trust in AI companies. The bipartisan legislation framework includes creating an independent oversight body, clarifying legal liability for AI harms, and requiring companies to disclose when users are interacting with AI models or systems. The hearing comes ahead of a major AI Insight Forum, where top tech executives will provide insights to all 100 senators.
California Senator Scott Wiener is introducing a bill to regulate artificial intelligence (AI) in the state, aiming to establish transparency requirements, legal liability, and security measures for advanced AI systems. The bill also proposes setting up a state research cloud called "CalCompute" to support AI development outside of big industry.
The Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Information Technology, and Government Innovation discussed the federal government's use of artificial intelligence (AI) and emphasized the need for responsible governance, oversight, and accountability to mitigate risks and protect civil liberties and privacy rights.
A new poll reveals that 63% of American voters believe regulation should actively prevent the development of superintelligent AI, challenging the assumption that artificial general intelligence (AGI) should exist. The public is increasingly questioning the potential risks and costs associated with AGI, highlighting the need for democratic input and oversight in the development of transformative technologies.
Artificial intelligence poses a potential threat to the 2024 US elections and financial markets, according to Senator Mark Warner, who highlights the risk of deep fakes and manipulation, and calls for new laws and penalties to deter bad actors.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to facilitate deceptive practices such as deepfake videos and misleading ads, posing a threat to American democracy, according to experts who testified before the U.S. Senate Rules Committee.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has the power to perpetuate discrimination, but experts also believe that AI can be leveraged to counter these issues by eliminating racial biases in the construction of AI systems. Legislative protections, such as an AI Bill of Rights and the Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2023, are being proposed to address the impact of AI systems on civil rights.
AI has the potential to exacerbate social and economic inequalities across race and other demographic characteristics, and to address this, policymakers and business leaders must consider algorithmic bias, automation and augmentation, and audience evaluations as three interconnected forces that can perpetuate or reduce inequality.
Minnesota Democrats are calling for regulations on artificial intelligence (AI) in elections, expressing concerns about the potential for AI to deceive and manipulate voters, while also acknowledging its potential benefits for efficiency and productivity in election administration.
AI has the potential to transform healthcare, but there are concerns about burdens on clinicians and biases in AI algorithms, prompting the need for a code of conduct to ensure equitable and responsible implementation.
Regulators should actively learn about algorithmic systems and evaluate them for compliance under existing statutory authority, utilizing tools such as transparency requirements, algorithmic investigations and audits, regulatory AI sandboxes, leveraging the AI assurance industry, and welcoming information from complaints and whistleblowers.
Democratic lawmakers have urged President Biden to turn non-binding safeguards on artificial intelligence (AI) into policy through an executive order, using the AI Bill of Rights as a guide to set in place comprehensive AI policy across the federal government.
A coalition of Democrats is urging President Biden to turn non-binding safeguards on artificial intelligence (AI) into policy through an executive order, using the "AI Bill of Rights" as a guide.
President Biden's executive order on artificial intelligence is expected to use the federal government's purchasing power to influence American AI standards, tighten industry guidelines, require cloud computing companies to monitor users developing powerful AI systems, and boost AI talent recruitment and domestic training.
Algorithmic discrimination poses a major social problem that will only be amplified by the use of generative AI, according to Toju Duke, former Google AI program manager, as she highlights the need for ethical considerations, diversity in teams, and standardized bodies to guide responsible AI development.
