1. Home
  2. >
  3. AI 🤖
Posted

AI fuels legal battles and book floods as archaic traditions clash with dystopian tech

  • Legal battle opens new front between AI like ChatGPT and human creativity, with authors suing over copyright
  • Amazon limits self-published books to 3 per day amid AI-written book flood
  • Lords filibuster and block big game trophy import ban bill, revealing archaic perspectives
  • Netflix to launch reality version of Squid Game, tempting contestants with $4.56 million prize
  • Show films in Bedfordshire and downplays original's dystopian satire
theguardian.com
Relevant topic timeline:
- OpenAI has hired Tom Rubin, a former Microsoft intellectual property lawyer, to oversee products, policy, and partnerships. - Rubin's role will involve negotiating deals with news publishers to license their material for training large-language models like ChatGPT. - Rubin had been an adviser to OpenAI since 2020 and was previously a law lecturer at Stanford University. - OpenAI has been approaching publishers to negotiate agreements for the use of their archives. - This hiring suggests OpenAI's focus on addressing intellectual property concerns and establishing partnerships with publishers.
Main topic: The New York Times may sue OpenAI for scraping its articles and images to train AI models. Key points: 1. The New York Times is considering a lawsuit to protect its intellectual property rights. 2. OpenAI could face devastating consequences, including the destruction of ChatGPT's dataset. 3. Fines of up to $150,000 per infringing piece of content could be imposed on OpenAI.
Main topic: Copyright concerns and potential lawsuits surrounding generative AI tools. Key points: 1. The New York Times may sue OpenAI for allegedly using its copyrighted content without permission or compensation. 2. Getty Images previously sued Stability AI for using its photos without a license to train its AI system. 3. OpenAI has begun acknowledging copyright issues and signed an agreement with the Associated Press to license its news archive.
The New York Times is considering legal action against OpenAI as it feels that the release of ChatGPT diminishes readers' incentives to visit its site, highlighting the ongoing debate about intellectual property rights in relation to generative AI tools and the need for more clarity on the legality of AI outputs.
Hollywood studios are considering the use of generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, to assist in screenwriting, but concerns remain regarding copyright protection for works solely created by AI, as they currently are not copyrightable.
OpenAI is releasing ChatGPT Enterprise, a version of its AI technology targeted at large businesses, offering enhanced security, privacy, and faster access to its services.
Leading news organizations, including CNN, The New York Times, and Reuters, have blocked OpenAI's web crawler, GPTBot, from scanning their content, as they fear the potential impact of the company's artificial intelligence technology on the already struggling news industry. Other media giants, such as Disney, Bloomberg, and The Washington Post, have also taken this defensive measure to safeguard their intellectual property rights and prevent AI models, like ChatGPT, from using their content to train their bots.
UK publishers have called on the prime minister to protect authors' intellectual property rights in relation to artificial intelligence systems, as OpenAI argues that authors suing them for using their work to train AI systems have misconceived the scope of US copyright law.
Artists Kelly McKernan, Karla Ortiz, and Sarah Andersen are suing makers of AI tools that generate new imagery on command, claiming that their copyrights are being violated and their livelihoods threatened by the use of their work without consent. The lawsuit may set a precedent for how difficult it will be for creators to stop AI developers from profiting off their work, as the technology advances.
The Guardian has blocked OpenAI from using its content for AI products like ChatGPT due to concerns about unlicensed usage, leading to lawsuits from writers and calls for intellectual property safeguards.
The decision of The Guardian to prevent OpenAI from using its content for training ChatGPT is criticized for potentially limiting the quality and integrity of information used by generative AI models.
Meta is being sued by authors who claim that their copyrighted works were used without consent to train the company's Llama AI language tool.
Authors, including Michael Chabon, are filing class action lawsuits against Meta and OpenAI, alleging copyright infringement for using their books to train artificial intelligence systems without permission, seeking the destruction of AI systems trained on their works.
OpenAI, a leading startup in artificial intelligence (AI), has established an early lead in the industry with its app ChatGPT and its latest AI model, GPT-4, surpassing competitors and earning revenues at an annualized rate of $1 billion, but it must navigate challenges and adapt to remain at the forefront of the AI market.
Amazon has introduced new guidelines requiring publishers to disclose the use of AI in content submitted to its Kindle Direct Publishing platform, in an effort to curb unauthorized AI-generated books and copyright infringement. Publishers are now required to inform Amazon about AI-generated content, but AI-assisted content does not need to be disclosed. High-profile authors have recently joined a class-action lawsuit against OpenAI, the creator of the AI chatbot, for alleged copyright violations.
OpenAI is expanding the capabilities of ChatGPT to include audio and image features, allowing users to have voice conversations with the chatbot and upload images for analysis, but the updates have raised concerns about privacy, intellectual property rights, and the potential displacement of jobs.
OpenAI's new flagship program, ChatGPT Enterprise, may not pose a significant threat to Palantir's dominance in the AI market due to their different target customer cohorts and use cases.
OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, is considering making its own AI chips due to a shortage of processors and the high costs associated with using Nvidia's chips.
Former Daedalic staffers reveal that the apology released for The Lord of the Rings Gollum was written using an AI program called ChatGPT, highlighting the flaws of the game's development and budget constraints.
German studio Daedalic Entertainment's game, The Lord of the Rings: Gollum, had a chaotic development process with allegations of enforced overtime, low wages, and a toxic work environment, and an investigative report claims that publisher Nacon used an AI model called ChatGPT to write the apology letter without Daedelic's approval.
The use of copyrighted materials to train AI models poses a significant legal challenge, with companies like OpenAI and Meta facing lawsuits for allegedly training their models on copyrighted books, and legal experts warning that copyright challenges could pose an existential threat to existing AI models if not handled properly. The outcome of ongoing legal battles will determine whether AI companies will be held liable for copyright infringement and potentially face the destruction of their models and massive damages.
Authors are expressing anger and incredulity over the use of their books to train AI models, leading to the filing of a class-action copyright lawsuit by the Authors Guild and individual authors against OpenAI and Meta, claiming unauthorized and pirated copies were used.
Tech companies like Meta, Google, and Microsoft are facing lawsuits from authors who accuse them of using their copyrighted books to train AI systems without permission or compensation, prompting a call for writers to band together and demand fair compensation for their work.
OpenAI is granting ChatGPT Plus and Enterprise subscribers access to its AI image generator, DALL-E 3, although ethical concerns and risks regarding harmful content remain.