Main topic: Copyright protection for works created by artificial intelligence (AI)
Key points:
1. A federal judge upheld a finding from the U.S. Copyright Office that AI-generated art is not eligible for copyright protection.
2. The ruling emphasized that human authorship is a fundamental requirement for copyright protection.
3. The judge stated that copyright law protects only works of human creation and is not designed to extend to non-human actors like AI.
The main topic is the debate surrounding artificial intelligence in the music industry.
1. Some believe AI has the potential to be useful for artists, musicians, and producers.
2. Others are concerned about the negative consequences and potential obsolescence if AI is not regulated properly.
3. Chris Lake, a producer and DJ, believes in embracing the benefits of AI but emphasizes the importance of regulation to prevent abuse.
### Summary
A federal judge in the US ruled that an AI-generated artwork is not eligible for copyright protection since it lacks human authorship.
### Facts
- The judge agreed with the US Copyright Office's rejection of a computer scientist's attempt to copyright an artwork generated by an AI model.
- The judge stated that copyright protection requires human authorship and that works absent of human involvement have been consistently denied copyright protection.
- The ruling raises questions about the level of human input needed for copyright protection of generative AI and the originality of artwork created by systems trained on copyrighted pieces.
- The US Copyright Office has issued guidance on copyrighting AI-generated images based on text prompts, generally stating that they are not eligible for protection.
- The agency has granted limited copyright protection to a graphic novel with AI-generated elements.
- The computer scientist plans to appeal the ruling.
### Summary
Artificial intelligence is bringing new possibilities to the world of art, enabling creatives to explore innovative design and aesthetics.
### Facts
- 💡 Artificial intelligence has given rise to a new branch of art.
- 🎨 It allows creatives to experiment with design, aesthetics, and discover new perspectives.
- 👨💼 Jeffrey Yin, CFO of Artsy, and artist Trevor Paglen discuss how AI is expanding the tools available in the art industry.
A federal judge ruled that AI-generated art is not eligible for copyright protection in the US due to the absence of human authorship.
Three artists, including concept artist Karla Ortiz, are suing AI art generators Stability AI, Midjourney, and DeviantArt for using their work to train generative AI systems without their consent, in a case that could test the boundaries of copyright law and impact the way AI systems are built. The artists argue that feeding copyrighted works into AI systems constitutes intellectual property theft, while AI companies claim fair use protection. The outcome could determine the legality of training large language models on copyrighted material.
The Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers has proposed guidelines for the usage of artificial intelligence (AI) and data transparency in the entertainment industry, stating that AI-created material cannot be considered literary or intellectually protected, and ensuring that credit, rights, and compensation for AI-generated scripts are given to the original human writer or reworker.
Several music stars, including Selena Gomez, Ed Sheeran, Drake, Lil Wayne, Liam Gallagher, and Grimes, have shared their thoughts on artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on the music industry, expressing concerns about job security, safety, and copyright protection, while others have shown support or interest in collaborating with AI-generated music.
Artificial intelligence (A.I.) may not pose a significant threat to human creativity or intellectual property, as machines still struggle to produce groundbreaking artistic work and are often limited to mimicry rather than true artistic expression.
The state of Kansas has implemented a new policy regarding the use of artificial intelligence, emphasizing the need for control, security, and editing of AI-generated content while recognizing its potential to enhance productivity and efficiency.
Salesforce has released an AI Acceptable Use Policy that outlines the restrictions on the use of its generative AI products, including prohibiting their use for weapons development, adult content, profiling based on protected characteristics, medical or legal advice, and more. The policy emphasizes the need for responsible innovation and sets clear ethical guidelines for the use of AI.
AI technology, specifically generative AI, is being embraced by the creative side of film and TV production to augment the work of artists and improve the creative process, rather than replacing them. Examples include the use of procedural generation and style transfer in animation techniques and the acceleration of dialogue and collaboration between artists and directors. However, concerns remain about the potential for AI to replace artists and the need for informed decision-making to ensure that AI is used responsibly.
A Washington D.C. judge has ruled that AI-generated art should not be awarded copyright protections since no humans played a central role in its creation, establishing a precedent that art should require human authorship; YouTube has partnered with Universal Music Group to launch an AI music incubator to protect artists from unauthorized use of their content; Meta has introduced an automated translator that works for multiple languages, but concerns have been raised regarding the impact it may have on individuals who wish to learn multiple languages; major studios are hiring "AI specialists" amidst a writers' strike, potentially leading to a future of automated entertainment that may not meet audience expectations.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is seen as a tool that can inspire and collaborate with human creatives in the movie and TV industry, but concerns remain about copyright and ethical issues, according to Greg Harrison, chief creative officer at MOCEAN. Although AI has potential for visual brainstorming and automation of non-creative tasks, it should be used cautiously and in a way that values human creativity and culture.
In a recent interview, Epica frontwoman Simone Simons expressed concerns about the use of artificial intelligence in music, stating that she believes "art needs to be created by actual flesh and blood" and that AI cannot compete with human creativity.
The United States Copyright Office has issued a notice of inquiry seeking public comment on copyright and artificial intelligence (AI), specifically on issues related to the content AI produces and how it should be treated when it imitates or mimics human artists.
The use of AI in the entertainment industry, such as body scans and generative AI systems, raises concerns about workers' rights, intellectual property, and the potential for broader use of AI in other industries, infringing on human connection and privacy.
Summary:
Artificial intelligence (AI) risks further exploitation and misrepresentation of Indigenous art, as well as encroaching on Indigenous rights, unless Indigenous people are involved in creating AI and deciding its scope, and Indigenous data sovereignty is respected.
Writer/director Cord Jefferson believes that while artificial intelligence has a place in creativity, it should be used in a way that supports artists rather than replacing them completely.
Congressman Clay Higgins (R-LA) plans to introduce legislation prohibiting the use of artificial intelligence (AI) by the federal government for law enforcement purposes, in response to the Internal Revenue Service's recently announced AI-driven tax enforcement initiative.
Google will require political advertisements that use artificial intelligence to disclose the use of AI-generated content, in order to prevent misleading and predatory campaign ads.
The rise of easily accessible artificial intelligence is leading to an influx of AI-generated goods, including self-help books, wall art, and coloring books, which can be difficult to distinguish from authentic, human-created products, leading to scam products and potential harm to real artists.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has released new guidelines for the use of artificial intelligence (AI), including a policy that prohibits the collection and dissemination of data used in AI activities and a requirement for thorough testing of facial recognition technologies to ensure there is no unintended bias.
The US Copyright Office has ruled for the third time that AI-generated art cannot be copyrighted, raising questions about whether AI-generated art is categorically excluded from copyright protection or if human creators should be listed as the image's creator. The office's position, which is based on existing copyright doctrine, has been criticized for being unscalable and a potential quagmire, as it fails to consider the creative choices made by AI systems similar to those made by human photographers.
David Salle, a renowned artist, is using artificial intelligence (A.I.) to create art and challenge conventional thinking about generative A.I. programs, teaching an A.I. algorithm to paint in his style and develop its own artistic intuition.
The boss of Spotify, Daniel Ek, stated that while there are valid uses of artificial intelligence (AI) in making music, AI should not be used to impersonate human artists without their consent, but there are debates and challenges surrounding the use of AI in the music industry. Spotify does not allow its content to be used to train machine learning or AI models, and there are increasing concerns among artists about the threat of AI to their profession.
The debate over whether government-imposed limits on AI computation would implicate the First Amendment arises as artists and creators are starting to explore the potential of AI in their work, and the question of whether there is a First Amendment right to compute becomes increasingly relevant in the context of expressive content generated by AI.
Media mogul Barry Diller criticizes generative artificial intelligence and calls for a redefinition of fair use to protect published material from being captured in AI knowledge-bases, following lawsuits against OpenAI for copyright infringement by prominent authors, and amidst a tentative labor agreement between Hollywood writers and studios.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to facilitate deceptive practices such as deepfake videos and misleading ads, posing a threat to American democracy, according to experts who testified before the U.S. Senate Rules Committee.
The development and use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in education raises questions about intellectual property rights, authorship, and the need for new regulations, with the potential for exacerbating existing inequities if not properly addressed.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize the entertainment industry by reducing production costs and saving time, but it should not replace or disrupt the creative process, according to a report by Bain & Co. The report emphasizes the need for a balance between utilizing new technologies and respecting the talent and creativity of artists and writers. The savings generated by AI and other technologies can enable studios to produce more high-quality content.
Minnesota Democrats are calling for regulations on artificial intelligence (AI) in elections, expressing concerns about the potential for AI to deceive and manipulate voters, while also acknowledging its potential benefits for efficiency and productivity in election administration.
Marvel Studios is facing backlash for allegedly using artificial intelligence in the design of the poster for the second season of the Disney+ series Loki, reigniting the debate over fair compensation and protection for artists against AI replacement in Hollywood.
AI-altered images of celebrities are being used to promote products without their consent, raising concerns about the misuse of artificial intelligence and the need for regulations to protect individuals from unauthorized AI-generated content.
Artificial intelligence is increasingly replacing human creativity in the arts, but some artists are embracing AI as another tool in their creative arsenal to push the boundaries of traditional art forms.
/https%3A%2F%2Ftf-cmsv2-smithsonianmag-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Ffiler_public%2F91%2F31%2F91312024-89f0-46c8-91a8-b9345fd64a92%2Fscreen_shot_2022-09-02_at_23648_pm.png)