The article discusses the recent strike by Hollywood actors' union, SAG-AFTRA, over pay and concerns about the future of the industry.
- The strike is the first in 43 years and has brought the American movie and television business to a halt.
- The actors are joining screenwriters, who went on strike in May, in picket lines across the country.
- The main issues at stake are the calculation of residuals for streaming entertainment and concerns about the rise of artificial intelligence in the industry.
- The article argues that the rise of streaming and the collapse of traditional distribution models have made it difficult to divide revenue and have increased the costs for studios.
- The article suggests that both talent and studios need to adapt to the new paradigm and focus on producing unique content rather than running streaming services.
Main Topic: Entertainment industry workers on strike for higher compensation and safeguards against artificial intelligence.
Key Points:
1. Entertainment industry workers are seeking higher base compensation and stricter safeguards against artificial intelligence.
2. The strike has caused financial hardship for many workers, with some losing their side jobs and dipping into savings.
3. Despite the financial toll, workers remain firm in their resolve to keep fighting for better conditions and believe the strike is a necessary sacrifice for long-term benefits.
### Summary
A US court ruled that creative work made by artificial intelligence is ineligible for copyright, a significant ruling amid the ongoing Hollywood writer's strike.
### Facts
- 🤖 Artificial intelligence-generated art cannot be protected by copyright, according to a US federal judge.
- 📜 The ruling may codify intellectual property rights regarding creative works made by AI versus those made by humans.
- ⚖️ The ruling was made by US District Court Judge Beryl A. Howell and supported by the register of copyrights and director of the US Copyright Office, Shira Perlmutter.
- ⚠️ The significance of the ruling comes amid ongoing writers' and actors' strikes in Hollywood, as there are fears that studios will use AI-generated work to avoid paying writers and actors.
- 🧠 The plaintiff, Stephen Thaler, argued that his AI, the "Creativity Machine," should be recognized as the author of a piece of artwork, but the US Copyright Office denied the application.
- 📚 The ruling also clarifies that the copyright for AI-generated work cannot be claimed by the AI's users under the work-for-hire doctrine.
### How does this relate to Hollywood and AI?
- 🎥 The ruling has implications for Hollywood's use of AI-generated content and the ongoing concerns of writers' and actors' unions.
- 💡 The question of copyrightability for works made by AI has become increasingly relevant as generative AI becomes more prevalent globally.
- 💰 Entertainment and media companies are investing significantly in generative AI and may become global leaders in the field.
- 🌐 By 2025, it is projected that 90% of all content may be partly AI-generated.
### Summary
A federal judge ruled that AI-generated art cannot be copyrighted, which could impact Hollywood studios and their use of AI.
### Facts
- 🤖 Plaintiff Stephen Thaler sued the US Copyright Office to have his AI system recognized as the creator of an artwork.
- 🚫 US District Judge Beryl Howell upheld the Copyright Office's decision to reject Thaler's copyright application.
- 📜 Howell stated that human authorship is a fundamental requirement for copyright and cited the "monkey selfie" case as an example.
- ❓ How much human input is needed for AI-generated works to qualify as authored by a human will be a question for future cases.
- ⚖️ Hollywood studios may face challenges in their contract disputes with striking actors and writers, as AI-generated works may not receive copyright protection.
The use of artificial intelligence in the entertainment industry is a major concern for Hollywood actors during ongoing strikes.
A federal judge has ruled that works created by artificial intelligence (A.I.) are not covered by copyrights, stating that copyright law is designed to incentivize human creativity, not non-human actors. This ruling has implications for the future role of A.I. in the music industry and the monetization of works created by A.I. tools.
The Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers has proposed guidelines for the usage of artificial intelligence (AI) and data transparency in the entertainment industry, stating that AI-created material cannot be considered literary or intellectually protected, and ensuring that credit, rights, and compensation for AI-generated scripts are given to the original human writer or reworker.
Hollywood studios are considering the use of generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, to assist in screenwriting, but concerns remain regarding copyright protection for works solely created by AI, as they currently are not copyrightable.
AI is revolutionizing the world of celebrity endorsements, allowing for personalized video messages from stars like Lionel Messi, but there are concerns about the loss of authenticity and artistic integrity as Hollywood grapples with AI's role in writing scripts and replicating performances, leading to a potential strike by actors' unions.
The use of copyrighted material to train generative AI tools is leading to a clash between content creators and AI companies, with lawsuits being filed over alleged copyright infringement and violations of fair use. The outcome of these legal battles could have significant implications for innovation and society as a whole.
A Washington D.C. judge has ruled that AI-generated art should not be awarded copyright protections since no humans played a central role in its creation, establishing a precedent that art should require human authorship; YouTube has partnered with Universal Music Group to launch an AI music incubator to protect artists from unauthorized use of their content; Meta has introduced an automated translator that works for multiple languages, but concerns have been raised regarding the impact it may have on individuals who wish to learn multiple languages; major studios are hiring "AI specialists" amidst a writers' strike, potentially leading to a future of automated entertainment that may not meet audience expectations.
Hollywood writers are on strike, and major issues include streaming, artificial intelligence, writers' rooms, and length of employment.
Artists Kelly McKernan, Karla Ortiz, and Sarah Andersen are suing AI tool makers in an effort to protect their copyrights and careers, alleging that their work has been used without consent to generate derivative works, which threatens artists' livelihoods; the lawsuit may set a precedent for creators' ability to stop AI developers from profiting off their work.
The ongoing strike by writers and actors in Hollywood may lead to the acceleration of artificial intelligence (AI) in the industry, as studios and streaming services could exploit AI technologies to replace talent and meet their content needs.
Hollywood production remains shutdown due to a strike by writers and actors, with negotiations focused on the role of artificial intelligence in the industry.
AI is a topic of concern and fascination within the music industry, as musicians and composers grapple with the potential benefits and threats it poses to their work, with tools already available that enable the creation of professional-sounding original compositions, but with debates surrounding the authenticity and copyright of AI-generated music.
The use of AI in the film industry has sparked a labor dispute between actors' union SAG-AFTRA and studios, with concerns being raised about the potential for AI to digitally replicate actors' images without fair compensation, according to British actor Stephen Fry.
AI technology is revolutionizing the music-making process, creating AI covers, generating original songs, and assisting with production and mixing, raising ethical and legal concerns and changing the landscape for musicians and fans alike.
High-profile songwriters are meeting with Congressmen to advocate for legislation protecting musicians' copyrights in the face of the rapid rise of artificial intelligence (AI) in the music industry. The industry wants clear legislation that requires permission from copyright holders to use pre-existing songs to train AI for generating new music.
AI technology has the potential to assist writers in generating powerful and moving prose, but it also raises complex ethical and artistic questions about the future of literature.
Hollywood writers and producers have made progress in negotiations to end the strike, but a major obstacle remains regarding the use of artificial intelligence.
US screenwriters may end their five-month strike after reaching a tentative deal with studio bosses, which still needs approval from Writers Guild of America (WGA) members.
Hollywood writers and studios have reached a tentative agreement to end the strike that has halted most productions since May, pending ratification by the Writers Guild of America.
Hollywood writers' strike may be coming to an end, but the threat of AI replacing human writers remains.
The historic writers' strike was partly a battle against the use of AI by studios to exploit writers, with concerns that AI would be used to justify lower fees and eventually replace writers altogether, leading to a strong public support for the writers' cause.
Voice actors in the video game industry are prepared to strike over a new contract that addresses issues of pay raises and the use of AI to alter or generate performances, as they fear advances in generative AI could threaten their livelihood and professional rights.
The Writers Guild of America has reached a tentative deal with major Hollywood studios, ending a nearly five-month strike and securing increases in wages and residuals, minimum staffing in TV writers rooms, streaming bonuses based on viewership, and protections against the use of artificial intelligence.
Creative writers are being sought after by AI training companies to improve the writing skills of AI models, offering hourly pay based on educational attainment and experience, potentially rendering writers' marketable skills obsolete.
The Writers Guild of America has reached a tentative deal with Hollywood studios after a five-month strike, with key points including limits on the use of artificial intelligence (AI), allowing writers to use AI with permission but not mandating its use, and preventing studios from using AI-generated material without informing the writers; however, concerns remain as SAG-AFTRA, the labor union representing actors, is still on strike and has raised worries about the impact of AI on their industry.
The Writers Guild of America's recent deal with Hollywood studios, which addresses the use of artificial intelligence (A.I.), sets a significant precedent for labor relations in a digital future, highlighting that workers can have a say in how A.I. is utilized in the workplace and ensuring that human writers receive credit and compensation for their work alongside A.I. tools.
AI-generated content is causing concern among writers, as it is predicted to disrupt their livelihoods and impact their careers, with over 1.4 billion jobs expected to be affected by AI in the next three years. However, while AI may change the writing industry, it is unlikely to completely replace writers, instead augmenting their work and providing tools to enhance productivity, according to OpenAI's ChatGPT.
The newly proposed WGA basic agreement protects Hollywood writers by specifying that AI-generated writing cannot be considered "literary material" and that writers must be credited and compensated for any use of AI in their work. The agreement also includes regular meetings to review the use of AI in film and TV production.
Hollywood writers have reached a groundbreaking agreement that establishes guidelines for the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in film and television, ensuring that writers have control over the technology and protecting their roles from being replaced by AI. This contract could serve as a model for other industries dealing with AI.
Hollywood strikes could be the beginning of a larger reckoning with artificial intelligence across various industries.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to disrupt the creative industry, with concerns raised about AI-generated models, music, and other creative works competing with human artists, leading to calls for regulation and new solutions to protect creators.
The 148-day-long Writers Guild of America strike is over, with screenwriters winning a new WGA contract that raises standards and establishes enforceable rules for the use of AI.
France’s Society of Authors, Composers and Publishers of Music (Sacem) has announced that it will require prior authorization for the use of its members' work in the development of artificial intelligence tools to ensure fair remuneration and respect for copyright. Sacem aims to make AI more virtuous and transparent without opposing its development. This comes amid growing debate in Europe over the implications of AI for professionals in the creative industries and the use of original works to train AI tools.
AI technology poses a threat to voice actors and artists as it can replicate their voices and movements without consent or compensation, emphasizing the need for legal protections and collective bargaining.
The publishing industry is grappling with concerns about the impact of AI on copyright, as well as the quality and ownership of AI-generated content, although some authors and industry players believe that AI writing still has a long way to go before it can fully replace human authors.
Hollywood actors on strike are fighting for protections from artificial intelligence (AI) that can replicate their likeness, raising concerns about control over their own images and the potential for disinformation.
Writers and artists are filing lawsuits over the use of copyrighted work in training large AI models, raising concerns about data sources and privacy, and the potential for bias in the generated content.
Special status is being sought by writers to protect their employment from technological progress, as they argue that software creators should obtain permission and pay fees to train AI language models with their work, even when copyright laws are not violated.
