- Capitol Hill is not known for being tech-savvy, but during a recent Senate hearing on AI regulation, legislators showed surprising knowledge and understanding of the topic.
- Senator Richard Blumenthal asked about setting safety breaks on AutoGPT, an AI agent that can carry out complex tasks, to ensure its responsible use.
- Senator Josh Hawley raised concerns about the working conditions of Kenyan workers involved in building safety filters for OpenAI's models.
- The hearing featured testimonies from Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, Stuart Russell, a computer science professor, and Yoshua Bengio, a professor at Université de Montréal.
- This indicates a growing awareness and interest among lawmakers in understanding and regulating AI technology.
### Summary
The article discusses the rapid advancement and potential risks of artificial intelligence (AI) and proposes the idea of nationalizing certain aspects of AI under a governing body called the Humane AI Commission to ensure AI is aligned with human interests.
### Facts
- AI is evolving rapidly and penetrating various aspects of American life, from image recognition to healthcare.
- AI has the potential to bring both significant benefits and risks to society.
- Transparency in AI is limited, and understanding how specific AI works is difficult.
- Congress is becoming more aware of the importance of AI and its need for regulation.
- The author proposes the creation of a governing body, the Humane AI Commission, that can control and steer AI technology to serve humanity's best interests.
- The nationalization of advanced AI models could be considered, similar to the Atomic Energy Commission's control over nuclear reactors.
- Various options, such as an AI pause or leaving AI development to the free market or current government agencies, have limitations in addressing the potential risks of AI.
- The author suggests that the United States should take a bold executive leadership approach to develop a national AI plan and ensure global AI leadership with a focus on benevolence and human-controlled AI.
### 🤖 AI Nationalization - The case to nationalize the “nuclear reactors” of AI — the world’s most advanced AI models — hinges on this question: Who do we want to control AI’s nuclear codes? Big Tech CEOs answering to a few billionaire shareholders, or the government of the United States, answering to its citizens?
### 👥 Humane AI Commission - The author proposes the creation of a Humane AI Commission, run by AI experts, to steer and control AI technology in alignment with human interests.
### ⚠️ Risks of AI - AI's rapid advancement and lack of transparency pose risks such as unpredictable behavior, potential damage to power generation, financial markets, and public health, and the potential for AI to move beyond human control.
### ⚖️ AI Regulation - The article calls for federal regulation of AI, but emphasizes the limitations of traditional regulation in addressing the fast-evolving nature of AI and the need for a larger-scale approach like nationalization.
### Summary
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) presents both beneficial possibilities and concerning risks, as experts warn about potential negative impacts including the threat of extinction. Government and industry efforts are being made to manage these risks and regulate AI technology, while also addressing concerns about misinformation, bias, and the need for societal literacy in understanding AI.
### Facts
- The use of AI is rapidly growing in various areas such as health care, the workplace, education, arts, and entertainment.
- The Center for AI Safety (CAIS) issued a warning signed by hundreds of individuals, including tech industry leaders and scientists, about the need to prioritize mitigating the risks of AI alongside global-scale dangers like pandemics and nuclear war.
- CEO of OpenAI, Sam Altman, expressed both the benefits and concerns associated with AI technology, emphasizing the need for serious consideration of its risks.
- Some experts believe that the warnings about potential risks from AI are more long-term scenarios rather than immediate doomsday situations, and caution against the hype surrounding AI.
- The National Council of State Legislatures is working on regulating AI at the state level, with several states already introducing AI bills and forming advisory groups.
- State legislators aim to define responsible AI utilization by governments and protect constituents engaging with AI in the private sector.
- The federal government is establishing National Artificial Intelligence Research Institutes to invest in long-term AI research.
- Misinformation and disinformation are concerns related to AI, as certain AI algorithms can generate biased and inaccurate information.
- OpenAI acknowledges the potential for AI tools to contribute to disinformation campaigns and is collaborating with researchers and industry peers to address this issue.
- The NCSL report highlights the need for policymakers to understand the programming decisions behind AI systems and their potential impact on citizens.
- Society lacks the ability and literacy to distinguish truth from false information, leading to the proliferation and belief in generative misinformation.
### 🤖 AI
- The use of artificial intelligence is rapidly advancing across various fields.
- Concerns have been raised about the potential risks and negative impacts of AI.
- Government and industry efforts are underway to manage AI risks and regulate the technology.
- Misinformation, bias, and the lack of societal literacy in understanding AI are additional challenges.
President Joe Biden relies on his science adviser Arati Prabhakar to guide the US approach to safeguarding AI technology, with cooperation from tech giants like Amazon, Google, Microsoft and Meta. Prabhakar discusses the need for understanding the implications and consequences of AI, the challenge of making AI models explainable, concerns about biases and privacy, and the importance of voluntary commitments from tech companies along with government actions.
The AI Stage agenda at TechCrunch Disrupt 2023 features discussions on topics such as AI valuations, ethical AI, AI in the cloud, AI-generated disinformation, robotics and self-driving cars, AI in movies and games, generative text AI, and real-world case studies of AI-powered industries.
Feuding tech billionaires Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg will attend a US Senate summit on AI regulation, where they will speak about how politicians can approach the technology, along with other senior tech leaders such as Microsoft's Satya Nadella and Alphabet's Sundar Pichai.
The UK will host a global summit on the safe use of artificial intelligence (AI) on 1 and 2 November, aiming to establish an international consensus on the future development of AI and address the risks associated with the technology. World leaders, AI companies, and experts will meet at Bletchley Park, where Alan Turing worked, to discuss the responsible development of AI. The guest list has yet to be confirmed, with uncertainty over whether China will be represented. The UK government hopes this summit will solidify its position as a major player in the AI sector.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer's upcoming AI summit in Washington D.C. will include key figures from Hollywood and Silicon Valley, indicating the growing threat that AI poses to the entertainment industry and the ongoing strikes in Hollywood. The event aims to establish a framework for regulating AI, but forming legislation will take time and involve multiple forums.
Several tech giants in the US, including Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta Platforms, and Amazon, have pledged to collaborate with the Biden administration to address the risks associated with artificial intelligence, focusing on safety, security, and trust in AI development.
The United States and China are creating separate spheres for technology, leading to a "Digital Cold War" where artificial intelligence (AI) plays a crucial role, and democracies must coordinate across governments and sectors to succeed in this new era of "re-globalization."
Lawmakers in the Senate Energy Committee were warned about the threats and opportunities associated with the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into the U.S. energy sector, with a particular emphasis on the risk posed by China's AI advancements and the need for education and regulation to mitigate negative impacts.
The rivalry between the US and China over artificial intelligence (AI) is intensifying as both countries compete for dominance in the emerging field, but experts suggest that cooperation on certain issues is necessary to prevent conflicts and ensure global governance of AI. While tensions remain high and trust is lacking, potential areas of cooperation include AI safety and regulations. However, failure to cooperate could increase the risk of armed conflict and hinder the exploration and governance of AI.
Tech industry lobbyists are turning their attention to state capitals in order to influence AI legislation and prevent the imposition of stricter rules across the nation, as states often act faster than Congress when it comes to tech issues; consumer advocates are concerned about the industry's dominance in shaping AI policy discussions.
Artificial intelligence poses a more imminent threat to humanity's survival than climate crisis, pandemics, or nuclear war, as discussed by philosopher Nick Bostrom and author David Runciman, who argue that challenges posed by AI can be negotiated by drawing on lessons learned from navigating state and corporate power throughout history.
Congress is holding its first-ever meeting on artificial intelligence, with prominent tech leaders like Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Bill Gates attending to discuss regulation of the fast-moving technology and its potential risks and benefits.
Eight big tech companies, including Adobe, IBM, Salesforce, and Nvidia, have pledged to conduct more testing and research on the risks of artificial intelligence (AI) in a meeting with White House officials, signaling a "bridge" to future government action on the issue. These voluntary commitments come amidst congressional scrutiny and ongoing efforts by the White House to develop policies for AI.
Senators Richard Blumenthal and Josh Hawley are holding a hearing to discuss legislation on regulating artificial intelligence (AI), with a focus on protecting against potential dangers posed by AI and improving transparency and public trust in AI companies. The bipartisan legislation framework includes creating an independent oversight body, clarifying legal liability for AI harms, and requiring companies to disclose when users are interacting with AI models or systems. The hearing comes ahead of a major AI Insight Forum, where top tech executives will provide insights to all 100 senators.
Artificial intelligence experts at the Forbes Global CEO Conference in Singapore expressed optimism about AI's future potential in enhancing various industries, including music, healthcare, and education, while acknowledging concerns about risks posed by bad actors and the integration of AI systems that emulate human cognition.
Tech industry leaders, including Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Sundar Pichai, are set to meet with lawmakers in Washington to discuss artificial intelligence and its implications, aiming to shape regulations and influence the direction of AI development.
The CEOs of several influential tech companies, including Google, IBM, Microsoft, and OpenAI, will meet with federal lawmakers as the US Senate prepares to draft legislation regulating the AI industry, reflecting policymakers' growing awareness of the potential disruptions and risks associated with AI technology.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk suggests the need for government regulation of artificial intelligence, even proposing the creation of a Department of AI, during a gathering of tech CEOs in Washington. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and other attendees also expressed the view that government should play a role in regulating AI. The options for regulation range from a standalone department to leveraging existing agencies, but the debate is expected to continue in the coming months.
Tech industry leaders gather for AI talks.
Recent Capitol Hill activity, including proposed legislation and AI hearings, provides corporate leaders with greater clarity on the federal regulation of artificial intelligence, offering insight into potential licensing requirements, oversight, accountability, transparency, and consumer protections.
The AI industry should learn from the regulatory challenges faced by the crypto industry and take a proactive approach in building relationships with lawmakers, highlighting the benefits of AI technology, and winning public support through campaigns in key congressional districts and states.
Tech leaders gathered in Washington, DC, to discuss AI regulation and endorsed the need for laws governing generative AI technology, although there was little consensus on the specifics of those regulations.
The UK's upcoming AI summit will focus on national security threats posed by advanced AI models and the doomsday scenario of AI destroying the world, gaining traction in other Western capitals.
A closed-door meeting between US senators and tech industry leaders on AI regulation has sparked debate over the role of corporate leaders in policymaking.
The Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Information Technology, and Government Innovation discussed the federal government's use of artificial intelligence (AI) and emphasized the need for responsible governance, oversight, and accountability to mitigate risks and protect civil liberties and privacy rights.
Representatives from several countries and companies announced commitments to harness the power of artificial intelligence (AI) to advance progress in achieving the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) during a ministerial side event at the United Nations' 78th Session High Level Week. These commitments focused on using AI to address issues related to health, education, food security, energy, and climate action, with an emphasis on inclusive and responsible governance of AI.
President Joe Biden addressed the United Nations General Assembly, expressing the need to harness the power of artificial intelligence for good while safeguarding citizens from its potential risks, as U.S. policymakers explore the proper regulations and guardrails for AI technology.
There is a need for more policy balance in discussions about artificial intelligence (AI) to focus on the potential for good and how to ensure societal benefit, as AI has the potential to advance education, national security, and economic success, while also providing new economic opportunities and augmenting human capabilities.
The Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University is hosting a series of discussions on the application of artificial intelligence in the energy sector, aiming to accelerate the discovery of new technologies and optimize operations.
The battle for the future of AI is not just a debate about the technology, but also about control, power, and how resources should be distributed, with factions divided by ideologies and motives, including concerns about existential risks, present-day harms, and national security.
Artificial intelligence (AI) will have a significant impact on geopolitics and globalization, driving a new globalization but also posing risks that the world is not yet ready for, according to political scientist Ian Bremmer. Global leaders and policymakers are now catching up and discussing the implications of AI, but a greater understanding of the technology is needed for effective regulation. Bremmer suggests international cooperation, such as a United Nations-driven process, to establish global oversight and prevent the U.S. versus China competition in AI development.
Separate negotiations on artificial intelligence in Brussels and Washington highlight the tension between prioritizing short-term risks and long-term problems in AI governance.
Advisers to UK Chancellor Rishi Sunak are working on a statement to be used in a communique at the AI safety summit next month, although they are unlikely to reach an agreement on establishing a new international organisation to oversee AI. The summit will focus on the risks of AI models, debate national security agencies' scrutiny of dangerous versions of the technology, and discuss international cooperation on AI that poses a threat to human life.
Britain will host the world's first global artificial intelligence (AI) safety summit, aiming to become an arbiter in the AI tech sector and address the existential threat AI poses, while also promoting international dialogue on AI regulation.
The United Kingdom will host an international summit on artificial intelligence safety in November 2023, focusing on the potential existential threat of AI and establishing the country as a mediator in technology post-Brexit. British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, along with Vice President Kamala Harris and other distinguished guests, aims to initiate a global conversation on AI regulation and address concerns about its misuse.
Dozens of speakers gathered at the TED AI conference in San Francisco to discuss the future of artificial intelligence, with some believing that human-level AI is approaching soon but differing opinions on whether it will be beneficial or dangerous. The event covered various topics related to AI, including its impact on society and the need for transparency in AI models.
Tech companies are attempting to "capture" the upcoming AI safety summit organized by Rishi Sunak, but experts argue that the conference needs to go beyond vague promises and implement a moratorium on developing highly advanced AI to prevent unforeseen risks.
The risks posed by artificial intelligence must be treated as seriously as the climate crisis, and immediate action is needed to address those risks, according to Demis Hassabis, the CEO of Google's AI unit. Hassabis suggests that oversight of the AI industry could start with a body similar to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
The British government will host an "AI Safety Summit" to discuss the risks and threats posed by AI models; however, regulators must not rush into implementing regulations without adequate research and understanding of the technology.
