- The AI Agenda is a new newsletter from The Information that focuses on the fast-paced world of artificial intelligence.
- The newsletter aims to provide daily insights on how AI is transforming various industries and the challenges it poses for regulators and content publishers.
- It will feature analysis from top researchers, founders, and executives, as well as provide scoops on deals and funding of key AI startups.
- The newsletter will cover advancements in AI technology such as ChatGPT and AI-generated video, and explore their impact on society.
- The goal is to provide readers with a clear understanding of the latest developments in AI and what to expect in the future.
- Social media creators are exploring the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance their personal brands and streamline their work.
- Giselle Ugarte, a popular TikTok creator with nearly 300,000 followers, is testing AI technology to assist with onboarding new clients.
- Ugarte collaborated with Vermont startup Render Media to create a digital likeness of herself for her business.
- She spent a few hours at Render's New York studio, posing for a camera and reading scripts in different moods to capture her likeness.
- The use of AI technology in this way could potentially save creators time and effort in managing their online presence and engaging with clients.
The main topic is the emergence of AI in 2022, particularly in the areas of image and text generation. The key points are:
1. AI models like DALL-E, MidJourney, and Stable Diffusion have revolutionized image generation.
2. ChatGPT has made significant breakthroughs in text generation.
3. The history of previous tech epochs shows that disruptive innovations often come from new entrants in the market.
4. Existing companies like Apple, Amazon, Facebook, Google, and Microsoft are well-positioned to capitalize on the AI epoch.
5. Each company has its own approach to AI, with Apple focusing on local deployment, Amazon on cloud services, Meta on personalized content, Google on search, and Microsoft on productivity apps.
AI labeling, or disclosing that content was generated using artificial intelligence, is not deemed necessary by Google for ranking purposes; the search engine values quality content, user experience, and authority of the website and author more than the origin of the content. However, human editors are still crucial for verifying facts and adding a human touch to AI-generated content to ensure its quality, and as AI becomes more widespread, policies and frameworks around its use may evolve.
The Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers has proposed guidelines for the usage of artificial intelligence (AI) and data transparency in the entertainment industry, stating that AI-created material cannot be considered literary or intellectually protected, and ensuring that credit, rights, and compensation for AI-generated scripts are given to the original human writer or reworker.
Artificial intelligence (AI) programmers are using the writings of authors to train AI models, but so far, the output lacks the creativity and depth of human writing.
Generative AI is enabling the creation of fake books that mimic the writing style of established authors, raising concerns regarding copyright infringement and right of publicity issues, and prompting calls for compensation and consent from authors whose works are used to train AI tools.
Hollywood studios are considering the use of generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, to assist in screenwriting, but concerns remain regarding copyright protection for works solely created by AI, as they currently are not copyrightable.
AI is revolutionizing the world of celebrity endorsements, allowing for personalized video messages from stars like Lionel Messi, but there are concerns about the loss of authenticity and artistic integrity as Hollywood grapples with AI's role in writing scripts and replicating performances, leading to a potential strike by actors' unions.
Artificial intelligence, particularly generative AI, is being embraced by the computer graphics and visual effects community at the 50th SIGGRAPH conference, with a focus on responsible and ethical AI, despite concerns about the technology's impact on Hollywood and the creative process.
The use of copyrighted material to train generative AI tools is leading to a clash between content creators and AI companies, with lawsuits being filed over alleged copyright infringement and violations of fair use. The outcome of these legal battles could have significant implications for innovation and society as a whole.
The Associated Press has released guidance on the use of AI in journalism, stating that while it will continue to experiment with the technology, it will not use it to create publishable content and images, raising questions about the trustworthiness of AI-generated news. Other news organizations have taken different approaches, with some openly embracing AI and even advertising for AI-assisted reporters, while smaller newsrooms with limited resources see AI as an opportunity to produce more local stories.
Artificial intelligence (A.I.) may not pose a significant threat to human creativity or intellectual property, as machines still struggle to produce groundbreaking artistic work and are often limited to mimicry rather than true artistic expression.
AI technology, specifically generative AI, is being embraced by the creative side of film and TV production to augment the work of artists and improve the creative process, rather than replacing them. Examples include the use of procedural generation and style transfer in animation techniques and the acceleration of dialogue and collaboration between artists and directors. However, concerns remain about the potential for AI to replace artists and the need for informed decision-making to ensure that AI is used responsibly.
Artificial intelligence can benefit authors by saving time and improving efficiency in tasks such as writing, formatting, summarizing, and analyzing user-generated data, although it is important to involve artists and use the technology judiciously.
A federal judge in the US rejected an attempt to copyright an artwork created by an AI, ruling that copyright law only protects works of human creation. However, the judge also acknowledged that as AI becomes more involved in the creation process, challenging questions about human input and authorship will arise.
Best-selling horror author Stephen King believes that opposing AI in creative fields is futile, acknowledging that his works have already been used to train AI models, although he questions whether machines can truly achieve the same level of creativity as humans. While Hollywood writers and actors are concerned about AI's threat to their industry and have gone on strike, King remains cautiously optimistic about the future of AI, acknowledging its potential challenges but leaving the door open for technology to someday generate bone-chilling, uncannily human art.
AI researcher Janelle Shane discusses the evolving weirdness of AI models, the problems with chatbots as search alternatives, their tendency to confidently provide incorrect answers, the use of drawing and ASCII art to reveal AI mistakes, and the AI's obsession with giraffes.
A Washington D.C. judge has ruled that AI-generated art should not be awarded copyright protections since no humans played a central role in its creation, establishing a precedent that art should require human authorship; YouTube has partnered with Universal Music Group to launch an AI music incubator to protect artists from unauthorized use of their content; Meta has introduced an automated translator that works for multiple languages, but concerns have been raised regarding the impact it may have on individuals who wish to learn multiple languages; major studios are hiring "AI specialists" amidst a writers' strike, potentially leading to a future of automated entertainment that may not meet audience expectations.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is seen as a tool that can inspire and collaborate with human creatives in the movie and TV industry, but concerns remain about copyright and ethical issues, according to Greg Harrison, chief creative officer at MOCEAN. Although AI has potential for visual brainstorming and automation of non-creative tasks, it should be used cautiously and in a way that values human creativity and culture.
The emergence of artificial intelligence systems that can quickly generate photorealistic images has the potential to distort society's understanding of reality, manipulate historical records, and disrupt the credibility of photography as a witness to events, raising concerns about the future of human creativity, expression, and communication.
Copy Magazine, the world's first AI-powered fashion magazine, creates realistic yet computer-generated images using AI algorithms, reflecting the stereotypes and norms of the fashion industry while prompting readers to question the reality and purpose of fashion imagery.
AI technology is making it easier and cheaper to produce mass-scale propaganda campaigns and disinformation, using generative AI tools to create convincing articles, tweets, and even journalist profiles, raising concerns about the spread of AI-powered fake content and the need for mitigation strategies.
The United States Copyright Office has issued a notice of inquiry seeking public comment on copyright and artificial intelligence (AI), specifically on issues related to the content AI produces and how it should be treated when it imitates or mimics human artists.
AI-assisted content production can help scale content strategy without sacrificing quality by implementing a system based on three key principles: human-AI collaboration, quality enhancement processes, and reducing production time, allowing content creators to generate high-quality articles more efficiently.
The ongoing strike by writers and actors in Hollywood may lead to the acceleration of artificial intelligence (AI) in the industry, as studios and streaming services could exploit AI technologies to replace talent and meet their content needs.
Copy magazine, the world's first AI fashion magazine, uses AI-generated images to challenge and critique the stereotypical vision of beauty that has been perpetuated for decades, serving as a warning to move forward and embrace diversity.
Artificial intelligence (AI) image generation tools, such as Midjourney and DALL·E 2, have gained popularity for their ability to create photorealistic images, artwork, and sketches with just a few text prompts. Other image generators like DreamStudio, Dream by WOMBO, and Canva offer unique features and styles for generating a wide range of images. However, copyright issues surrounding AI-generated images have led to ongoing lawsuits.
Researchers have admitted to using a chatbot to help draft an article, leading to the retraction of the paper and raising concerns about the infiltration of generative AI in academia.
The creator of an AI-generated artwork is unable to copyright it, as the US Copyright Office states that human authorship is necessary for copyright, which could have implications for the popularity of AI art generators.
AI Comic Factory is an online tool that uses AI to generate comic book pages based on user descriptions, allowing users to create their own comics without the need for drawing skills.
Blogger Samantha North uses AI tools to generate ideas and elements of her blogs, but still values the importance of human expertise and experience in creating valuable content for her readers.
Sony Pictures Entertainment CEO, Tony Vinciquerra, believes that artificial intelligence (AI) is a valuable tool for writers and actors, dismissing concerns that AI will replace human creativity in the entertainment industry. He emphasizes that AI can enhance productivity and speed up production processes, but also acknowledges the need to find a common ground with unions concerned about job loss and intellectual property rights.
The iconic entertainment site, The A.V. Club, received backlash for publishing AI-generated articles that were found to be copied verbatim from IMDb, raising concerns about the use of AI in journalism and its potential impact on human jobs.
The rise of easily accessible artificial intelligence is leading to an influx of AI-generated goods, including self-help books, wall art, and coloring books, which can be difficult to distinguish from authentic, human-created products, leading to scam products and potential harm to real artists.
An AI-generated spiral-shaped medieval village created using Stable Diffusion and ControlNet has gained attention and praise on social media, impressing many users and even passing the Turing Test for AI-generated art according to Y-Combinator co-founder Paul Graham, while others criticized the composition and identified artifacts of AI art in the image.
Artificial intelligence should not be used in journalism due to the potential for generating fake news, undermining the principles of journalism, and threatening the livelihood of human journalists.
AI technology, particularly generative language models, is starting to replace human writers, with the author of this article experiencing firsthand the impact of AI on his own job and the writing industry as a whole.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is being increasingly used in game development, with AI-generated characters and dialogues creating more immersive experiences, although its limitations mean that humans still play a crucial role, and game developers believe AI will never be able to replace the unique combination of story, art, sound, and overall experience that games offer, while the use of AI in translation tasks in the gaming industry is leading to lower pay for translators and a decline in translation quality, causing concerns among professionals in the field.
AI technology has the potential to assist writers in generating powerful and moving prose, but it also raises complex ethical and artistic questions about the future of literature.
Getty Images is reaffirming its stance against AI-generated content by banning submissions created with Adobe's Firefly-powered generative AI tools, a move that contrasts with competitor Shutterstock's allowance of AI-generated content.
The use of generative AI poses risks to businesses, including the potential exposure of sensitive information, the generation of false information, and the potential for biased or toxic responses from chatbots. Additionally, copyright concerns and the complexity of these systems further complicate the landscape.
The US Copyright Office has ruled for the third time that AI-generated art cannot be copyrighted, raising questions about whether AI-generated art is categorically excluded from copyright protection or if human creators should be listed as the image's creator. The office's position, which is based on existing copyright doctrine, has been criticized for being unscalable and a potential quagmire, as it fails to consider the creative choices made by AI systems similar to those made by human photographers.
