Google has questioned the motivations of the US Justice Department's top antitrust official in a filing to a district court, arguing that his past clients create an ethical conflict and raise doubts about the government's lawsuit against the tech giant.
Apple executives Eddy Cue, John Giannandrea, and Adrian Perica will testify in an antitrust investigation into Google's alleged abuse of its search engine dominance, despite Apple's argument that it would be burdensome; Apple's multi-billion dollar deal with Google is a key aspect of the case.
The US Justice Department has started a 10-week trial against Google, accusing the company of monopolistic practices in dominating the search engine market through its business partnerships, including with Apple, to ensure its search engine is the default on mobile devices.
Google has reached an agreement in principle with US states to settle an antitrust lawsuit over its alleged monopolistic practices in the Google Play Store, which accused the company of inflating prices for paid apps and in-app purchases in the Android app market.
Google previewed its defense against the U.S. government's charges of illegal monopolization, claiming that its distribution agreements do not harm competition and that consumers have the ability to easily change search engine defaults.
Google will face a high-stakes antitrust trial brought by the US government and multiple states, which could have significant implications for the tech giant's dominant search business.
The landmark antitrust trial against Google marks a broader reconsideration of the notion that the internet is inherently open and self-regulating, as regulators seek to prevent dominant technology companies from stifling innovation in emerging fields such as artificial intelligence.
The government's antitrust case against Google, which parallels the landmark case against Microsoft 25 years ago, lacks the same cultural impact despite similar accusations of unfair market dominance.
Google maintains a dominant position in the global search engine market with a 90.7% market share, while its competitors like Bing and Yahoo lag far behind, according to data from Similarweb. However, Google is currently facing a civil antitrust lawsuit by the U.S. Justice Department for alleged anticompetitive practices. Bing, despite its AI-powered version, has not made significant progress in challenging Google's dominance.
The Justice Department's antitrust trial against Google began with claims that the company pursued agreements to be the default search engine on mobile devices, while Google argued that its search engine's quality was the primary reason for such agreements.
The U.S. Justice Department objects to excluding the public from court discussions on Google's pricing for online advertising, arguing that it is essential information in the antitrust case against the tech giant.
Apple's senior vice president of ML and AI strategy, John Giannandrea, testified in the Department of Justice antitrust suit against Google and highlighted a new feature in iOS 17 that allows users to choose two different default search engines for normal browsing and private browsing.
The Department of Justice has filed an antitrust lawsuit against Google, alleging that the company's billion-dollar deals to be the default search engine on smartphones have created a monopoly, and if the trial is successful, Google may be forced to break up its various businesses.
Apple senior vice president Eddy Cue is expected to testify in court that Apple chose Google as the default search engine on the iPhone because it was the best product and that Apple has revenue-sharing agreements with other search engines, shedding light on Google's licensing agreements and the accusation of monopolizing online search.
Apple used the possibility of replacing Google with Microsoft's Bing as a bargaining chip to extract bigger payments from Google, according to a Microsoft executive testifying in the US antitrust trial against Google.
Microsoft executive testifies that Apple and other smartphone makers declined revenue sharing agreements with Bing, allowing Google to maintain its dominant position as the default search engine on those devices.
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella testified in the U.S. antitrust fight between the Justice Department and Google, dismissing the idea that it is easy to change defaults on devices and revealing that Microsoft had sought to make Bing the default search engine on Apple smartphones but was rejected.
Apple has the potential to compete with Google in building a search engine, as it has a strong search team and has developed a next-generation search engine called "Pegasus," but currently, Apple benefits from the $15 billion annual payment it receives from Google to keep Google Search as the default on Safari.
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella testified against Google in an antitrust case, expressing concerns about Google's dominance in the search space and its potential to become even more pervasive with the integration of artificial intelligence. Meanwhile, the Department of Justice has filed a civil antitrust lawsuit against Google for monopolizing digital advertising technologies and breaching the Sherman Act, with allegations of subverting competition and protecting its monopoly through exclusive deals. These developments echo the Microsoft case from 25 years ago and raise questions about meaningful change in web search and AI-powered features for internet users.
Apple has turned down opportunities to challenge Google's search engine dominance, including the chance to purchase Bing and make DuckDuckGo the default for Safari's private browsing mode, according to court transcripts unsealed in the US government's antitrust lawsuit against Google.
Apple considered buying or investing in the Bing search engine in 2018 as an alternative to Google for Siri and other features, according to testimony from Apple's head of machine learning, John Giannandrea, in the Department of Justice's antitrust case against Google. However, the deal with Microsoft did not go forward, and Apple ultimately chose to continue its partnership with Google.
The US Federal Trade Commission is investigating Amazon and Google for alleged monopolistic practices, with Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella testifying against Google's attempts to monopolize the search market by paying to make its search engine the default choice for Apple and Android.
Google's payment to Apple for maintaining its position as the default search engine on iOS devices is estimated to be between $18 billion and $20 billion per year, according to financial advisor Bernstein, with the deal accounting for 14-16% of Apple's annual operating profits; however, the ongoing antitrust trial against Google could put this agreement at risk.
Google CEO Sundar Pichai expressed concerns about the optics of Google's deal with Apple, which made Google the pre-selected search option on Apple's Safari browser, according to emails introduced as evidence in the Justice Department's antitrust case against Google.
Google pays Apple between $18 and $20 billion per year to be the default search engine on iPhones, representing roughly 15% of Apple's annual operating profits, and there is a possibility that federal courts could force Google to terminate its search deal with Apple as part of the Department of Justice's antitrust lawsuit against Google.
Google CEO Sundar Pichai expressed concerns about the lack of choice in Apple's pre-selected search option on the Safari browser, according to emails introduced as evidence in the Justice Department's antitrust case against Google.
Google has announced that it will defend users of its generative artificial intelligence systems in their platforms if they are accused of intellectual property violations, making them the first major technology company to offer comprehensive indemnity coverage.
Google could be paying Apple between $18 billion to $20 billion a year to maintain its status as the dominant search engine on the iPhone, potentially generating 14-16% of Apple's annual operating profits, but this agreement may be at risk due to an ongoing antitrust suit.
