1. Home
  2. >
  3. AI đŸ€–
Posted

Sean Penn Blasts AI Exploitation of Actors' Likenesses as Indecent

  • Sean Penn strongly opposes studios using AI to exploit actor likenesses without consent. He provocatively suggests using studio heads' daughters.

  • Penn calls the AI likeness issue "indecent" and a "lack of morality."

  • Penn has spoken out against AI use at Cannes and sees it as "human obscenity."

  • Writers and actors unions remain at odds with studios over AI and other issues.

  • Major studios like Disney and Netflix are pushing ahead with AI despite objections.

indiewire.com
Relevant topic timeline:
- Social media creators are exploring the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance their personal brands and streamline their work. - Giselle Ugarte, a popular TikTok creator with nearly 300,000 followers, is testing AI technology to assist with onboarding new clients. - Ugarte collaborated with Vermont startup Render Media to create a digital likeness of herself for her business. - She spent a few hours at Render's New York studio, posing for a camera and reading scripts in different moods to capture her likeness. - The use of AI technology in this way could potentially save creators time and effort in managing their online presence and engaging with clients.
### Summary A new episode of Netflix's "Black Mirror" explores how celebrities will contend with AI replicas, raising concerns about regulations and potential brand risks. The use of AI-generated replicas has already been a topic of discussion among actors and performers, who are demanding better protections. This development could also have implications for regular people managing their own digital likenesses. ### Facts - The latest episode of "Black Mirror" focuses on a woman named Joan who discovers a show on a streaming platform that features a digital replica of her, portrayed by actress Annie Murphy. - Actors have been striking to demand protections from studios regarding generative AI, including regulations for AI-generated replicas. - Some celebrities are considering the coexistence of their AI replicas, which could bring new monetization options but also increase brand risks. - The use of AI-generated replicas may extend to regular people, as companies like Soul Machines offer products for designing autonomously-animated digital persons. - Soul Machines has created digitized versions of celebrities like Carmelo Anthony, Mark Tuan, and Jack Nicklaus. - Another company called Hyperreal allows individuals to create digital versions of themselves for future generations. ### Loading Something is loading.
### Summary The entertainment industry is experiencing a hiring boom for AI-related positions as companies, including Netflix, Disney, and Sony, aim to expand their machine learning capabilities. This has raised concerns among writers and actors about the potential impact of AI on their livelihoods. ### Facts - The Writers Guild of America (WGA) is concerned that generative AI could replace human writers, allowing studios to cut costs. - The Screen Actors Guild (Sag-Aftra) is worried about the use of digital likenesses, with studios proposing to pay background actors for perpetual image usage. - Companies like Netflix, Disney, and Amazon have numerous open positions related to machine learning and AI, indicating a push to build up machine learning capabilities. - The expansion of AI employment in the entertainment industry extends beyond generative AI, encompassing areas like recommendations, advertising, and dubbing of foreign languages. - The hiring boom reflects a broader trend of companies seeking AI leadership roles across various industries. - Disney has formed an internal task force to study AI and is embracing AI as part of its creative future. - Generative AI is already being used in various aspects of entertainment production, including visual effects, dubbing, and even generating full episodes or movies. - Writers and actors are demanding protections over AI, including the use of their creative material and AI-generated scripts. - The current agreement between the WGA and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP) does not consider AI-generated material eligible for credit.
### Summary A federal judge ruled that AI-generated art cannot be copyrighted, which could impact Hollywood studios and their use of AI. ### Facts - đŸ€– Plaintiff Stephen Thaler sued the US Copyright Office to have his AI system recognized as the creator of an artwork. - đŸš« US District Judge Beryl Howell upheld the Copyright Office's decision to reject Thaler's copyright application. - 📜 Howell stated that human authorship is a fundamental requirement for copyright and cited the "monkey selfie" case as an example. - ❓ How much human input is needed for AI-generated works to qualify as authored by a human will be a question for future cases. - ⚖ Hollywood studios may face challenges in their contract disputes with striking actors and writers, as AI-generated works may not receive copyright protection.
Generative AI is starting to impact the animation and visual effects industry, with companies like Base Media exploring its potentials, but concerns about job security and copyright infringement remain.
The Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers has proposed guidelines for the usage of artificial intelligence (AI) and data transparency in the entertainment industry, stating that AI-created material cannot be considered literary or intellectually protected, and ensuring that credit, rights, and compensation for AI-generated scripts are given to the original human writer or reworker.
AI is revolutionizing the world of celebrity endorsements, allowing for personalized video messages from stars like Lionel Messi, but there are concerns about the loss of authenticity and artistic integrity as Hollywood grapples with AI's role in writing scripts and replicating performances, leading to a potential strike by actors' unions.
Artificial intelligence, particularly generative AI, is being embraced by the computer graphics and visual effects community at the 50th SIGGRAPH conference, with a focus on responsible and ethical AI, despite concerns about the technology's impact on Hollywood and the creative process.
The use of copyrighted material to train generative AI tools is leading to a clash between content creators and AI companies, with lawsuits being filed over alleged copyright infringement and violations of fair use. The outcome of these legal battles could have significant implications for innovation and society as a whole.
A federal judge in the US rejected an attempt to copyright an artwork created by an AI, ruling that copyright law only protects works of human creation. However, the judge also acknowledged that as AI becomes more involved in the creation process, challenging questions about human input and authorship will arise.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is seen as a tool that can inspire and collaborate with human creatives in the movie and TV industry, but concerns remain about copyright and ethical issues, according to Greg Harrison, chief creative officer at MOCEAN. Although AI has potential for visual brainstorming and automation of non-creative tasks, it should be used cautiously and in a way that values human creativity and culture.
Artists Kelly McKernan, Karla Ortiz, and Sarah Andersen are suing AI tools makers, including Stability AI, Midjourney, and DeviantArt, for copyright infringement by using their artwork to generate new images without their consent, highlighting the threat to artists' livelihoods posed by artificial intelligence.
“A Recent Entrance to Paradise” is a pixelated artwork created by an artificial intelligence called DABUS in 2012. However, its inventor, Stephen Thaler, has been denied copyright for the work by a judge in the US. This decision has sparked a series of legal battles in different countries, as Thaler believes that DABUS, his AI system, is sentient and should be recognized as an inventor. These lawsuits raise important questions about intellectual property and the rights of AI systems. While Thaler's main supporter argues that machine inventions should be protected to encourage social good, Thaler himself sees these cases as a way to raise awareness about the existence of a new species. The debate revolves around whether AI systems can be considered creators and should be granted copyright and patent rights. Some argue that copyright requires human authorship, while others believe that intellectual property rights should be granted regardless of the involvement of a human inventor or author. The outcome of these legal battles could have significant implications for the future of AI-generated content and the definition of authorship.
The use of AI in the entertainment industry, such as body scans and generative AI systems, raises concerns about workers' rights, intellectual property, and the potential for broader use of AI in other industries, infringing on human connection and privacy.
Generative AI is making its presence felt at the Venice film festival, with one of the highlights being a VR installation that creates a personalized portrait of users' lives based on their answers to personal questions. While there are concerns about the impact of AI on the entertainment industry, XR creators believe that the community is still too small to be seen as a significant threat. However, they also acknowledge that regulation will eventually be necessary as the artform grows and reaches a mass audience.
AMPTP studios have been including clauses in actors' contracts that set up artificial intelligence traps, leading to concerns about consent and the use of actors' likeness or image without their agreement.
The author suggests that Hollywood's portrayal of machines turning against humans reflects humanity's own deviousness and lack of trust, implying that if artificial intelligence leads to the downfall of humanity, it is a consequence of our own actions.
Tim Burton and other directors express their concerns about the use of artificial intelligence in creating content, stating that it takes away from the essence of the craft and the humanity that goes into their work.
California lawmakers are introducing a bill that would allow actors and artists to nullify contracts that permit studios to use artificial intelligence to digitally clone their voices, faces, and bodies, in an effort to protect workers from being replaced by their digital replicas.
Sony Pictures Entertainment CEO, Tony Vinciquerra, believes that artificial intelligence (AI) is a valuable tool for writers and actors, dismissing concerns that AI will replace human creativity in the entertainment industry. He emphasizes that AI can enhance productivity and speed up production processes, but also acknowledges the need to find a common ground with unions concerned about job loss and intellectual property rights.
Actor Sean Penn is expressing concern over the use of artificial intelligence, particularly in regards to the use of actors' likeness and voices in future productions, calling it a "lack of morality" and a "human obscenity."
Tim Burton criticizes BuzzFeed for using AI to replicate his signature style, stating that it feels like a robot taking away his humanity and soul.
The use of AI in the film industry has sparked a labor dispute between actors' union SAG-AFTRA and studios, with concerns being raised about the potential for AI to digitally replicate actors' images without fair compensation, according to British actor Stephen Fry.
Actor and author Stephen Fry expresses concern over the use of AI technology to mimic his voice in a historical documentary without his knowledge or permission, highlighting the potential dangers of AI-generated content.
The US Copyright Office has ruled for the third time that AI-generated art cannot be copyrighted, raising questions about whether AI-generated art is categorically excluded from copyright protection or if human creators should be listed as the image's creator. The office's position, which is based on existing copyright doctrine, has been criticized for being unscalable and a potential quagmire, as it fails to consider the creative choices made by AI systems similar to those made by human photographers.
As AI technology progresses, creators are concerned about the potential misuse and exploitation of their work, leading to a loss of trust and a polluted digital public space filled with untrustworthy content.
Media mogul Barry Diller criticizes generative artificial intelligence and calls for a redefinition of fair use to protect published material from being captured in AI knowledge-bases, following lawsuits against OpenAI for copyright infringement by prominent authors, and amidst a tentative labor agreement between Hollywood writers and studios.
AI is being integrated into various products, from smart glasses to voice assistants, making our devices more responsive and immersive. This trend towards greater immersion blurs the boundary between the physical and digital worlds, raising concerns about privacy, manipulation, and safety. Immersive environments can be both useful and dangerous, as VR harassment can feel real, and misinformation campaigns can be more persuasive. Generative AI could worsen manipulation in these environments, tailoring interactive media to be as deceptive as possible. To prevent this, regulators need to establish rules to protect privacy and ensure safe development and use of AI in immersive technologies. Without adequate safeguards, AI-driven manipulation could result in personalized influence campaigns, making it even easier to manipulate people. To mitigate these risks, strong privacy laws, clear ethical guidelines, and best practices for handling user data are necessary. While waiting for policymakers to catch up, it is crucial for individuals to educate themselves about these technologies and the potential harm they may cause. People need to be empowered to make these tools work for their benefit, rather than the other way around.
Artificial intelligence is seen as a valuable tool in Hollywood's visual effects industry, enhancing human creativity and productivity, but it is not viewed as an existential threat, according to the VFX supervisor of the film The Creator.
Summary: A man in South Korea has been jailed for using AI to create explicit images of children, highlighting the legal consequences of misusing advanced technology, while strategists predict that AI will help the US maintain its economic dominance over China due to investments and research. Additionally, a study by Harvard and BCG revealed that AI can enhance productivity but also increases error rates, and Big Tech's influence on emerging AI startups is evident through deals and partnerships. Furthermore, AI-generated content demonstrates gender bias in leadership depictions, emphasizing the importance of monitoring AI-generated content to prevent harmful biases.
Hollywood writers have reached a groundbreaking agreement that establishes guidelines for the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in film and television, ensuring that writers have control over the technology and protecting their roles from being replaced by AI. This contract could serve as a model for other industries dealing with AI.
Tom Hanks warns his followers about an AI video featuring a computer-generated image of himself, emphasizing the rising importance of protecting actors' likenesses as intellectual property in the age of AI.
Zelda Williams, daughter of Robin Williams, spoke out against AI recreations of her father, stating that they are "personally disturbing" and infringe upon the rights of living actors to create characters with their own choices and human effort. Many other actors, directors, and writers have also criticized AI, expressing concerns about its implications and the potential for companies to evade responsibility for their actions.
Celebrities such as Tom Hanks and Gayle King have become victims of AI-powered scams, with AI-generated versions of themselves being used to promote fraudulent products, raising concerns about the use of AI in digital media.
Marvel Studios is facing backlash for allegedly using artificial intelligence in the design of the poster for the second season of the Disney+ series Loki, reigniting the debate over fair compensation and protection for artists against AI replacement in Hollywood.
AI-altered images of celebrities are being used to promote products without their consent, raising concerns about the misuse of artificial intelligence and the need for regulations to protect individuals from unauthorized AI-generated content.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to disrupt the creative industry, with concerns raised about AI-generated models, music, and other creative works competing with human artists, leading to calls for regulation and new solutions to protect creators.
Summary: The use of pirated books to train artificial intelligence systems has raised concerns among authors, as AI-generated content becomes more prevalent in various fields, including education and the workplace. The battle between humans and machines has already begun, with authors trying to fight back through legal actions and Hollywood industry professionals protecting their work from AI.
Deepfake videos featuring celebrities like Gayle King, Tom Hanks, and Elon Musk have prompted concerns about the misuse of AI technology, leading to calls for legislation and ethical considerations in their creation and dissemination. Celebrities have denounced these AI-generated videos as inauthentic and misleading, emphasizing the need for legal protection and labeling of such content.
Summary: Artificial intelligence technology is making its way into the entertainment industry, with writers now having the freedom to incorporate AI software into their creative process, raising questions about its usefulness and the ability to differentiate between human and machine-generated content.
A bipartisan bill, called the NO FAKES Act, has been introduced to protect performers' likeness from unauthorized digital replicas created through generative AI technology. The bill aims to hold individuals and platforms accountable for producing and hosting such content, while exempting certain replicas based on First Amendment protections.